Seek Returns logo

EAT vs. ETSY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EAT and ETSY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEATETSY
Company NameBrinker International, Inc.Etsy, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization7.00 billion USD6.95 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 6, 1984April 16, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EAT and ETSY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EAT vs. ETSY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEATETSY
5-Day Price Return-1.32%15.87%
13-Week Price Return8.09%47.28%
26-Week Price Return-13.66%26.38%
52-Week Price Return129.95%31.77%
Month-to-Date Return-0.14%20.28%
Year-to-Date Return18.97%32.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.50M5.78M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.55M5.58M
3-Month Volatility39.65%48.56%
Beta1.451.86

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EAT

301.31%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

EAT’s Return on Equity of 301.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ETSY

67.87%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

ETSY’s Return on Equity of 67.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EAT vs. ETSY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EAT

6.49%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

EAT’s Net Profit Margin of 6.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ETSY

5.78%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

ETSY’s Net Profit Margin of 5.78% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EAT vs. ETSY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EAT

8.62%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

EAT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.62% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ETSY

10.25%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

ETSY’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.25% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EAT vs. ETSY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEATETSY
Return on Equity (TTM)301.31%67.87%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.99%6.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.49%5.78%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.62%10.25%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)17.64%72.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EAT

0.28

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

EAT’s Current Ratio of 0.28 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ETSY

3.39

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

ETSY’s Current Ratio of 3.39 is in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

EAT vs. ETSY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EAT

2.09

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

EAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.09 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ETSY

4.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.11, ETSY operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Broadline Retail industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

EAT vs. ETSY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EAT

3.54

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

EAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.54 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ETSY

-193.71

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

ETSY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -193.71. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

EAT vs. ETSY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEATETSY
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.283.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.203.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.094.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.54-193.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

EAT vs. ETSY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EAT vs. ETSY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EAT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ETSY

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ETSY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EAT vs. ETSY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EAT

0.39%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.39% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ETSY

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ETSY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EAT vs. ETSY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEATETSY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.39%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EAT

21.53

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

EAT’s P/E Ratio of 21.53 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ETSY

41.67

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

A P/E Ratio of 41.67 places ETSY in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EAT vs. ETSY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EAT

1.40

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

EAT’s P/S Ratio of 1.40 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ETSY

2.41

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

ETSY’s P/S Ratio of 2.41 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EAT vs. ETSY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EAT

26.43

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 26.43, EAT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ETSY

16.01

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

At 16.01, ETSY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Broadline Retail industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EAT vs. ETSY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEATETSY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.5341.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.402.41
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)26.4316.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.3210.77