Seek Returns logo

EA vs. SONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EA and SONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

EA is a standard domestic listing, while SONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolEASONY
Company NameElectronic Arts Inc.Sony Group Corporation
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryEntertainmentHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization50.16 billion USD176.89 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateSeptember 20, 1989February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EA and SONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EA vs. SONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEASONY
5-Day Price Return-0.17%0.62%
13-Week Price Return15.11%10.12%
26-Week Price Return34.89%26.61%
52-Week Price Return23.56%13.72%
Month-to-Date Return0.50%4.99%
Year-to-Date Return37.43%35.00%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.89M16.09M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.31M13.78M
3-Month Volatility33.78%36.95%
Beta0.741.33

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EA

13.68%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.86%
Q3
22.17%
Median
13.67%
Q1
4.55%
Min
-17.95%

EA’s Return on Equity of 13.68% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.77%
Q3
17.22%
Median
11.18%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-7.31%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EA vs. SONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EA

12.14%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
29.05%
Median
15.14%
Q1
4.44%
Min
-21.70%

EA’s Net Profit Margin of 12.14% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.03%
Q3
9.13%
Median
6.61%
Q1
3.40%
Min
-4.24%

SONY’s Net Profit Margin of 9.13% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Durables industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EA vs. SONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EA

17.06%

Entertainment Industry

Max
43.42%
Q3
28.90%
Median
18.77%
Q1
9.11%
Min
-4.88%

EA’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.06% is around the midpoint for the Entertainment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.79%
Q3
12.10%
Median
9.44%
Q1
5.22%
Min
-3.50%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EA vs. SONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEASONY
Return on Equity (TTM)13.68%14.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.17%3.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.14%9.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.06%11.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)78.79%31.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EA

0.84

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.06
Median
1.58
Q1
0.87
Min
0.38

EA’s Current Ratio of 0.84 falls into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.43
Q3
3.68
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.75

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

EA vs. SONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EA

0.31

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.80
Median
0.15
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

EA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.77
Q3
0.83
Median
0.34
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EA vs. SONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EA

190.43

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 190.43, EA demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

EA vs. SONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEASONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.841.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.841.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.310.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)190.43104.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

EA vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EA vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EA

0.39%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.71%
Q3
1.23%
Median
0.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EA’s Dividend Yield of 0.39% is consistent with its peers in the Entertainment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SONY

0.42%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.27%
Q3
3.94%
Median
1.84%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.42% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EA vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EA

21.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
37.50%
Median
24.18%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.92% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max
154.55%
Q3
65.87%
Median
40.54%
Q1
6.74%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EA vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEASONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.39%0.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)21.92%10.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EA

56.66

Entertainment Industry

Max
80.06
Q3
53.00
Median
28.44
Q1
18.00
Min
2.61

A P/E Ratio of 56.66 places EA in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SONY

25.04

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.05
Q3
20.97
Median
12.60
Q1
9.92
Min
6.71

A P/E Ratio of 25.04 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EA vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EA

6.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
10.86
Q3
6.98
Median
4.25
Q1
2.56
Min
0.51

EA’s P/S Ratio of 6.88 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SONY

2.29

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.31
Median
0.86
Q1
0.56
Min
0.15

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 2.29 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EA vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EA

8.38

Entertainment Industry

Max
19.63
Q3
10.35
Median
5.18
Q1
2.07
Min
0.59

EA’s P/B Ratio of 8.38 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.77
Q3
2.08
Median
1.44
Q1
1.07
Min
0.58

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EA vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEASONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)56.6625.04
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.882.29
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.382.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.3614.27