Seek Returns logo

EA vs. MU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EA and MU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEAMU
Company NameElectronic Arts Inc.Micron Technology, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryEntertainmentSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization44.64 billion USD139.07 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 20, 1989June 1, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EA and MU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EA vs. MU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEAMU
5-Day Price Return9.62%11.08%
13-Week Price Return19.52%34.65%
26-Week Price Return35.15%31.45%
52-Week Price Return22.27%31.31%
Month-to-Date Return16.99%13.86%
Year-to-Date Return21.94%47.66%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.73M22.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.12M23.44M
3-Month Volatility26.34%40.91%
Beta0.751.52

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EA

15.27%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

EA’s Return on Equity of 15.27% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MU

13.02%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

MU’s Return on Equity of 13.02% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EA vs. MU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EA

13.94%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

EA’s Net Profit Margin of 13.94% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MU

18.41%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

MU’s Net Profit Margin of 18.41% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EA vs. MU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EA

19.09%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

EA’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.09% is around the midpoint for the Entertainment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MU

22.59%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

MU’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.59% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EA vs. MU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEAMU
Return on Equity (TTM)15.27%13.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.23%8.52%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.94%18.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.09%22.59%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.14%37.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EA

0.84

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

EA’s Current Ratio of 0.84 falls into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MU

2.75

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

MU’s Current Ratio of 2.75 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EA vs. MU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EA

0.31

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

EA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MU

0.31

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EA vs. MU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EA

190.43

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 190.43, EA demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MU

20.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

MU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EA vs. MU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEAMU
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.842.75
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.841.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.310.31
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)190.4320.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

EA vs. MU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EA vs. MU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EA

0.44%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EA’s Dividend Yield of 0.44% is consistent with its peers in the Entertainment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MU

0.37%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Yield of 0.37% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EA vs. MU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EA

18.91%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.91% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MU

8.37%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.37% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EA vs. MU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEAMU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.44%0.37%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.91%8.37%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EA

43.10

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

EA’s P/E Ratio of 43.10 is within the middle range for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MU

22.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

MU’s P/E Ratio of 22.40 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EA vs. MU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EA

6.01

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

EA’s P/S Ratio of 6.01 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MU

4.12

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

MU’s P/S Ratio of 4.12 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EA vs. MU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EA

6.60

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

EA’s P/B Ratio of 6.60 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MU

2.13

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

MU’s P/B Ratio of 2.13 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EA vs. MU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEAMU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)43.1022.40
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.014.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.602.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.1769.91