Seek Returns logo

EA vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EA and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEAJBL
Company NameElectronic Arts Inc.Jabil Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryEntertainmentElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization44.64 billion USD23.51 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateSeptember 20, 1989May 3, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EA and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EA vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEAJBL
5-Day Price Return9.62%-0.64%
13-Week Price Return19.52%35.45%
26-Week Price Return35.15%32.18%
52-Week Price Return22.27%114.74%
Month-to-Date Return16.99%-1.83%
Year-to-Date Return21.94%52.24%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.73M1.23M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.12M1.42M
3-Month Volatility26.34%32.78%
Beta0.751.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EA

15.27%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

EA’s Return on Equity of 15.27% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JBL

38.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EA vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EA

13.94%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

EA’s Net Profit Margin of 13.94% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JBL

2.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EA vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EA

19.09%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

EA’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.09% is around the midpoint for the Entertainment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JBL

4.08%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EA vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEAJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)15.27%38.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.23%3.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.94%2.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.09%4.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.14%8.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EA

0.84

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

EA’s Current Ratio of 0.84 falls into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

JBL

0.98

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

EA vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EA

0.31

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

EA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JBL

2.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

EA vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EA

190.43

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 190.43, EA demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

JBL

11.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EA vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEAJBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.840.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.840.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.312.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)190.4311.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

EA vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EA vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EA

0.44%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EA’s Dividend Yield of 0.44% is consistent with its peers in the Entertainment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

JBL

0.16%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EA vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EA

18.91%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.91% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

JBL

6.59%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EA vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEAJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.44%0.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.91%6.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EA

43.10

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

EA’s P/E Ratio of 43.10 is within the middle range for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JBL

40.82

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 40.82 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EA vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EA

6.01

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

EA’s P/S Ratio of 6.01 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JBL

0.83

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.83 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

EA vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EA

6.60

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

EA’s P/B Ratio of 6.60 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JBL

14.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 14.04, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EA vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEAJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)43.1040.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.010.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.6014.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.1720.23