Seek Returns logo

EA vs. GRAB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EA and GRAB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEAGRAB
Company NameElectronic Arts Inc.Grab Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesSingapore
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesIndustrials
GICS IndustryEntertainmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization44.64 billion USD20.87 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 20, 1989December 1, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EA and GRAB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EA vs. GRAB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEAGRAB
5-Day Price Return9.62%3.43%
13-Week Price Return19.52%2.61%
26-Week Price Return35.15%9.64%
52-Week Price Return22.27%57.06%
Month-to-Date Return16.99%4.70%
Year-to-Date Return21.94%8.47%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.73M35.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.12M37.98M
3-Month Volatility26.34%40.83%
Beta0.750.86

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EA

15.27%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

EA’s Return on Equity of 15.27% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GRAB

1.73%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

GRAB’s Return on Equity of 1.73% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

EA vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EA

13.94%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

EA’s Net Profit Margin of 13.94% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GRAB

3.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Net Profit Margin of 3.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EA vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EA

19.09%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

EA’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.09% is around the midpoint for the Entertainment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GRAB

-1.63%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

GRAB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1.63%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

EA vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEAGRAB
Return on Equity (TTM)15.27%1.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.23%1.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.94%3.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.09%-1.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.14%42.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EA

0.84

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

EA’s Current Ratio of 0.84 falls into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GRAB

1.88

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

GRAB’s Current Ratio of 1.88 is in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

EA vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EA

0.31

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

EA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GRAB

0.30

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, GRAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

EA vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EA

190.43

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 190.43, EA demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GRAB

-3.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

GRAB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.80. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

EA vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEAGRAB
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.841.88
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.841.82
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.310.30
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)190.43-3.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

EA vs. GRAB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EA vs. GRAB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EA

0.44%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EA’s Dividend Yield of 0.44% is consistent with its peers in the Entertainment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

GRAB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EA vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EA

18.91%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.91% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GRAB

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

GRAB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EA vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEAGRAB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.44%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.91%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EA

43.10

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

EA’s P/E Ratio of 43.10 is within the middle range for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GRAB

188.01

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

At 188.01, GRAB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

EA vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EA

6.01

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

EA’s P/S Ratio of 6.01 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GRAB

6.79

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 6.79, GRAB trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

EA vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EA

6.60

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

EA’s P/B Ratio of 6.60 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GRAB

3.22

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

GRAB’s P/B Ratio of 3.22 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EA vs. GRAB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEAGRAB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)43.10188.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.016.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.603.22
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)24.1734.27