Seek Returns logo

EA vs. GDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EA and GDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

EA is a standard domestic listing, while GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolEAGDS
Company NameElectronic Arts Inc.GDS Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryEntertainmentIT Services
Market Capitalization50.16 billion USD5.75 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGM
Listing DateSeptember 20, 1989November 2, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EA and GDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EA vs. GDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEAGDS
5-Day Price Return-0.17%-9.57%
13-Week Price Return15.11%-9.85%
26-Week Price Return34.89%7.99%
52-Week Price Return23.56%-19.97%
Month-to-Date Return0.50%-13.70%
Year-to-Date Return37.43%29.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.89M5.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.31M10.11M
3-Month Volatility33.78%59.37%
Beta0.742.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EA

13.68%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.86%
Q3
22.17%
Median
13.67%
Q1
4.55%
Min
-17.95%

EA’s Return on Equity of 13.68% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GDS

19.17%

IT Services Industry

Max
37.08%
Q3
19.28%
Median
14.70%
Q1
6.70%
Min
-8.16%

GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.17% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EA vs. GDS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EA

12.14%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
29.05%
Median
15.14%
Q1
4.44%
Min
-21.70%

EA’s Net Profit Margin of 12.14% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GDS

42.87%

IT Services Industry

Max
17.01%
Q3
11.02%
Median
6.91%
Q1
3.07%
Min
-5.13%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 42.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

EA vs. GDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EA

17.06%

Entertainment Industry

Max
43.42%
Q3
28.90%
Median
18.77%
Q1
9.11%
Min
-4.88%

EA’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.06% is around the midpoint for the Entertainment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GDS

22.44%

IT Services Industry

Max
23.01%
Q3
15.32%
Median
9.57%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.58%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.44% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EA vs. GDS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEAGDS
Return on Equity (TTM)13.68%19.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.17%6.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.14%42.87%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.06%22.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)78.79%21.45%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EA

0.84

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.06
Median
1.58
Q1
0.87
Min
0.38

EA’s Current Ratio of 0.84 falls into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GDS

2.00

IT Services Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.91
Median
1.36
Q1
1.02
Min
0.49

GDS’s Current Ratio of 2.00 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

EA vs. GDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EA

0.31

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.80
Median
0.15
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

EA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GDS

1.82

IT Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.30
Median
0.55
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.82. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

EA vs. GDS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EA

190.43

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 190.43, EA demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
1.68
Min
-28.15

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

EA vs. GDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEAGDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.842.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.841.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.311.82
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)190.430.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

EA vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EA vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EA

0.39%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.71%
Q3
1.23%
Median
0.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EA’s Dividend Yield of 0.39% is consistent with its peers in the Entertainment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
4.66%
Q3
2.02%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EA vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EA

21.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
37.50%
Median
24.18%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.92% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
93.78%
Q3
63.22%
Median
24.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EA vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEAGDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.39%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)21.92%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EA

56.66

Entertainment Industry

Max
80.06
Q3
53.00
Median
28.44
Q1
18.00
Min
2.61

A P/E Ratio of 56.66 places EA in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GDS

9.32

IT Services Industry

Max
45.03
Q3
30.25
Median
21.01
Q1
16.50
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 9.32 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

EA vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EA

6.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
10.86
Q3
6.98
Median
4.25
Q1
2.56
Min
0.51

EA’s P/S Ratio of 6.88 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDS

3.99

IT Services Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.01
Median
2.18
Q1
1.08
Min
0.00

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 3.99 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EA vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EA

8.38

Entertainment Industry

Max
19.63
Q3
10.35
Median
5.18
Q1
2.07
Min
0.59

EA’s P/B Ratio of 8.38 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GDS

1.61

IT Services Industry

Max
9.42
Q3
5.79
Median
3.70
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.61 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

EA vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEAGDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)56.669.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.883.99
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.381.61
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.36--