Seek Returns logo

E vs. SLB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at E and SLB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

E trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, SLB is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolESLB
Company NameEni S.p.A.Schlumberger Limited
CountryItalyUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization53.08 billion USD50.05 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 28, 1995December 31, 1981
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of E and SLB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

E vs. SLB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolESLB
5-Day Price Return0.17%2.32%
13-Week Price Return10.73%-6.42%
26-Week Price Return8.02%-16.23%
52-Week Price Return3.21%-23.58%
Month-to-Date Return0.07%-0.74%
Year-to-Date Return13.98%-12.49%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.93M11.79M
3-Month Avg. Volume13.08M16.87M
3-Month Volatility14.75%31.66%
Beta0.641.00

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

E

5.77%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

E’s Return on Equity of 5.77% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SLB

19.85%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.62%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-6.65%

SLB’s Return on Equity of 19.85% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

E

2.82%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

E’s Net Profit Margin of 2.82% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SLB

11.53%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.78%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.11%
Min
1.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.53% places SLB in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

E

6.21%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

E’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.21% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SLB

15.24%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.90%
Q3
17.97%
Median
10.83%
Q1
5.79%
Min
-5.29%

SLB’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.24% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolESLB
Return on Equity (TTM)5.77%19.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.11%8.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.82%11.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.21%15.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.10%20.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

E

1.18

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

E’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SLB

1.31

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
2.12
Median
1.44
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

SLB’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

E

0.70

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

E’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SLB

0.67

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
0.97
Median
0.47
Q1
0.35
Min
0.02

SLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

E

7.19

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

E’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.19 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SLB

43.97

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
25.59
Median
7.66
Q1
2.90
Min
-17.36

SLB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.97 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolESLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.181.31
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.020.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.700.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.1943.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

E vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

E vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

E

6.82%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

E’s Dividend Yield of 6.82% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SLB

3.13%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.19%
Q1
0.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.13%, SLB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

E

103.61%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

E’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 103.61% is in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SLB

38.00%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
200.86%
Q3
147.58%
Median
28.52%
Q1
15.22%
Min
0.00%

SLB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.00% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolESLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.82%3.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)103.61%38.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

E

15.19

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

E’s P/E Ratio of 15.19 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SLB

12.14

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
30.60
Q3
21.14
Median
12.35
Q1
10.72
Min
5.76

SLB’s P/E Ratio of 12.14 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

E

0.43

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, E’s P/S Ratio of 0.43 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SLB

1.40

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.58
Median
0.85
Q1
0.55
Min
0.23

SLB’s P/S Ratio of 1.40 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

E

0.87

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

E’s P/B Ratio of 0.87 is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SLB

2.25

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.43
Median
1.82
Q1
1.18
Min
0.27

SLB’s P/B Ratio of 2.25 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolESLB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.1912.14
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.431.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.872.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.3010.35