Seek Returns logo

E vs. SLB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at E and SLB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

E trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, SLB is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolESLB
Company NameEni S.p.A.Schlumberger Limited
CountryItalyUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization53.19 billion USD51.18 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 28, 1995December 31, 1981
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of E and SLB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

E vs. SLB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolESLB
5-Day Price Return-3.06%-2.42%
13-Week Price Return6.39%-3.90%
26-Week Price Return4.03%-18.04%
52-Week Price Return5.37%-22.03%
Month-to-Date Return0.07%-0.32%
Year-to-Date Return13.64%-10.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume12.24M15.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.59M15.96M
3-Month Volatility13.45%29.72%
Beta0.670.75

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

E

8.04%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

E’s Return on Equity of 8.04% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SLB

19.85%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
19.11%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.55%
Min
-1.07%

In the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, SLB’s Return on Equity of 19.85% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

E

3.92%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

E’s Net Profit Margin of 3.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SLB

11.53%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
17.17%
Q3
9.96%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-0.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.53% places SLB in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

E

8.40%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

E’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.40% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SLB

15.24%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.93%
Median
11.31%
Q1
4.98%
Min
0.83%

SLB’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.24% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolESLB
Return on Equity (TTM)8.04%19.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.94%8.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.92%11.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.40%15.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.08%20.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

E

1.18

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

E’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SLB

1.31

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.08
Median
1.38
Q1
1.10
Min
0.68

SLB’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

E

0.70

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

E’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SLB

0.67

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.10
Median
0.48
Q1
0.34
Min
0.02

SLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

E

7.19

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

E’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.19 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SLB

43.97

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
26.65
Median
7.66
Q1
2.15
Min
-17.36

SLB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.97 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolESLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.181.31
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.020.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.700.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.1943.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

E vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

E vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

E

6.84%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

E’s Dividend Yield of 6.84% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SLB

3.04%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.36%
Q3
4.38%
Median
2.41%
Q1
0.32%
Min
0.00%

SLB’s Dividend Yield of 3.04% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

E

74.43%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

E’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 74.43% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SLB

38.00%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
94.25%
Median
39.49%
Q1
15.00%
Min
0.00%

SLB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.00% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolESLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.84%3.04%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)74.43%38.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

E

10.88

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

E’s P/E Ratio of 10.88 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SLB

12.49

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
22.89
Q3
18.22
Median
13.03
Q1
11.98
Min
7.14

SLB’s P/E Ratio of 12.49 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

E

0.43

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, E’s P/S Ratio of 0.43 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SLB

1.44

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.60
Median
0.87
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

SLB’s P/S Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

E

0.87

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

E’s P/B Ratio of 0.87 is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SLB

2.25

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.44
Q3
2.60
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.24

SLB’s P/B Ratio of 2.25 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

E vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolESLB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.8812.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.431.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.872.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.2710.64