Seek Returns logo

DUO vs. KIM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DUO and KIM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A key difference in structure is that DUO is a conventional stock, whereas KIM is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate.

SymbolDUOKIM
Company NameFangdd Network Group Ltd.Kimco Realty Corporation
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesReal Estate
GICS IndustryInteractive Media & ServicesRetail REITs
Market Capitalization0.02 billion USD14.62 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNYSE
Listing DateNovember 1, 2019November 22, 1991
Security TypeCommon StockREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DUO and KIM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DUO vs. KIM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDUOKIM
5-Day Price Return-11.37%0.19%
13-Week Price Return61.79%1.61%
26-Week Price Return-30.00%2.43%
52-Week Price Return-82.99%-7.32%
Month-to-Date Return43.51%-1.51%
Year-to-Date Return-64.16%-8.15%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.17M3.72M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.64M4.05M
3-Month Volatility204.50%19.31%
Beta2.741.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DUO

-6.44%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
33.08%
Median
10.37%
Q1
5.76%
Min
-24.17%

DUO has a negative Return on Equity of -6.44%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

KIM

5.66%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
16.17%
Q3
9.03%
Median
6.12%
Q1
3.81%
Min
-3.17%

KIM’s Return on Equity of 5.66% is on par with the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

DUO vs. KIM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DUO

-6.13%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.74%
Q3
29.54%
Median
20.53%
Q1
7.52%
Min
-14.52%

DUO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -6.13%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

KIM

28.54%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
75.53%
Q3
49.82%
Median
28.35%
Q1
20.68%
Min
-8.79%

In the Retail REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

DUO vs. KIM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DUO

-32.65%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.82%
Median
18.53%
Q1
7.69%
Min
-18.13%

DUO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -32.65%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

KIM

32.62%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
102.11%
Q3
58.14%
Median
38.63%
Q1
25.00%
Min
-8.87%

In the Retail REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

DUO vs. KIM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDUOKIM
Return on Equity (TTM)-6.44%5.66%
Return on Assets (TTM)-3.50%2.99%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-6.13%28.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-32.65%32.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)15.59%68.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DUO

1.66

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.72
Median
1.85
Q1
1.20
Min
0.25

DUO’s Current Ratio of 1.66 aligns with the median group of the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KIM

1.47

Retail REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
0.97
Median
0.55
Q1
0.32
Min
0.07

KIM’s Current Ratio of 1.47 is in the upper quartile for the Retail REITs industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

DUO vs. KIM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DUO

0.03

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.85
Q3
0.49
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, DUO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

KIM

0.78

Retail REITs Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.27
Median
0.92
Q1
0.68
Min
0.34

KIM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Retail REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

DUO vs. KIM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DUO

3.98

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.65
Q3
16.48
Median
6.73
Q1
-0.87
Min
-3.62

DUO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.98 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KIM

2.05

Retail REITs Industry

Max
4.31
Q3
3.30
Median
2.15
Q1
1.29
Min
-0.08

KIM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Retail REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DUO vs. KIM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDUOKIM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.661.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.311.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.030.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.982.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

DUO vs. KIM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DUO vs. KIM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DUO

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.07%
Q3
1.27%
Median
0.28%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DUO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KIM

4.75%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
6.92%
Q3
5.10%
Median
4.50%
Q1
3.89%
Min
2.37%

KIM’s Dividend Yield of 4.75% is consistent with its peers in the Retail REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

DUO vs. KIM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DUO

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
101.53%
Q3
40.64%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DUO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KIM

117.45%

Retail REITs Industry

Max
195.40%
Q3
125.60%
Median
85.02%
Q1
51.07%
Min
12.86%

KIM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 117.45% is within the typical range for the Retail REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

DUO vs. KIM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDUOKIM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.75%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%117.45%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DUO

--

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.72
Q3
41.60
Median
25.84
Q1
18.18
Min
1.76

P/E Ratio data for DUO is currently unavailable.

KIM

24.75

Retail REITs Industry

Max
42.04
Q3
28.02
Median
21.98
Q1
15.79
Min
6.89

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Retail REITs industry.

DUO vs. KIM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DUO

0.24

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.76
Q3
11.40
Median
7.69
Q1
2.49
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, DUO’s P/S Ratio of 0.24 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

KIM

7.06

Retail REITs Industry

Max
13.05
Q3
9.54
Median
6.95
Q1
5.59
Min
3.06

KIM’s P/S Ratio of 7.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Retail REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DUO vs. KIM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DUO

0.16

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
16.71
Q3
9.00
Median
3.97
Q1
2.19
Min
0.33

DUO’s P/B Ratio of 0.16 is below the established floor for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This may signal that the market is deeply pessimistic or has overlooked the company, potentially offering its asset base at a significant discount.

KIM

1.35

Retail REITs Industry

Max
2.70
Q3
1.64
Median
1.05
Q1
0.91
Min
0.58

KIM’s P/B Ratio of 1.35 is within the conventional range for the Retail REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

DUO vs. KIM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Retail REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDUOKIM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--24.75
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.247.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.161.35
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)0.5830.46