Seek Returns logo

DUO vs. IRM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DUO and IRM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A key difference in structure is that DUO is a conventional stock, whereas IRM is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate.

SymbolDUOIRM
Company NameFangdd Network Group Ltd.Iron Mountain Incorporated
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesReal Estate
GICS IndustryInteractive Media & ServicesSpecialized REITs
Market Capitalization0.01 billion USD27.13 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNYSE
Listing DateNovember 1, 2019February 1, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DUO and IRM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DUO vs. IRM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDUOIRM
5-Day Price Return17.10%1.46%
13-Week Price Return-58.04%-5.59%
26-Week Price Return-83.72%0.10%
52-Week Price Return-79.08%-18.99%
Month-to-Date Return-15.15%-5.64%
Year-to-Date Return-83.91%-12.60%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.08M1.11M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.50M1.51M
3-Month Volatility99.40%23.86%
Beta2.621.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DUO

10.28%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
29.69%
Median
9.73%
Q1
2.47%
Min
-26.19%

DUO’s Return on Equity of 10.28% is on par with the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IRM

85.19%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
37.66%
Q3
20.19%
Median
8.96%
Q1
6.32%
Min
-1.71%

IRM’s Return on Equity of 85.19% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

DUO vs. IRM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DUO

9.09%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.41%
Q3
29.38%
Median
17.14%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-30.88%

DUO’s Net Profit Margin of 9.09% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Interactive Media & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IRM

0.64%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
67.81%
Q3
40.70%
Median
25.91%
Q1
11.01%
Min
1.95%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

DUO vs. IRM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DUO

-38.04%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.95%
Median
18.60%
Q1
5.69%
Min
-18.13%

DUO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -38.04%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

IRM

16.17%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
55.10%
Median
41.03%
Q1
17.97%
Min
5.94%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

DUO vs. IRM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDUOIRM
Return on Equity (TTM)10.28%85.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.39%0.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.09%0.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-38.04%16.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)18.21%66.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DUO

1.68

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
4.30
Q3
2.68
Median
1.96
Q1
1.21
Min
0.45

DUO’s Current Ratio of 1.68 aligns with the median group of the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IRM

0.63

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.13
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
0.09

IRM’s Current Ratio of 0.63 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DUO vs. IRM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DUO

0.00

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.90
Q3
0.47
Median
0.16
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, DUO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IRM

685.59

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.26
Median
1.09
Q1
0.58
Min
0.16

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 685.59, IRM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialized REITs industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

DUO vs. IRM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DUO

3.98

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
67.60
Q3
29.41
Median
6.36
Q1
-0.87
Min
-37.02

DUO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.98 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IRM

1.36

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.05
Median
2.99
Q1
2.10
Min
1.28

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, IRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.36 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

DUO vs. IRM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDUOIRM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.680.63
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.580.54
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.00685.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.981.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

DUO vs. IRM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DUO vs. IRM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DUO

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
1.87%
Q3
1.08%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DUO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IRM

3.17%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
7.06%
Q3
5.09%
Median
4.51%
Q1
3.18%
Min
1.78%

IRM’s Dividend Yield of 3.17% is in the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

DUO vs. IRM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DUO

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.35%
Q3
38.67%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DUO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IRM

400.99%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
295.93%
Q3
182.11%
Median
119.31%
Q1
65.42%
Min
43.86%

At 400.99%, IRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

DUO vs. IRM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDUOIRM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%400.99%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DUO

1.35

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
87.79
Q3
54.33
Median
25.46
Q1
18.76
Min
6.96

DUO’s P/E Ratio of 1.35 is below the typical range for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

IRM

654.09

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
85.59
Q3
64.69
Median
29.09
Q1
18.22
Min
8.79

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

DUO vs. IRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DUO

0.12

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
19.01
Q3
12.39
Median
6.49
Q1
1.94
Min
0.22

DUO’s P/S Ratio of 0.12 falls below the typical floor for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This could suggest the stock is overlooked or deeply undervalued relative to its sales, but may also reflect significant market concerns about its future.

IRM

4.20

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
9.60
Median
8.74
Q1
5.61
Min
1.63

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, IRM’s P/S Ratio of 4.20 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

DUO vs. IRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DUO

0.35

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
11.66
Q3
7.17
Median
4.17
Q1
2.80
Min
0.12

DUO’s P/B Ratio of 0.35 is in the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

IRM

1,254.25

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
11.33
Q3
5.68
Median
2.69
Q1
1.81
Min
0.71

At 1,254.25, IRM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

DUO vs. IRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Interactive Media & Services and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDUOIRM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)1.35654.09
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.124.20
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.351,254.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)0.25385.38