DRS vs. OC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 21, 2025

Here’s a clear look at DRS and OC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	DRS	OC
Company Name	Leonardo DRS, Inc.	Owens Corning
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Aerospace & Defense	Building Products
Market Capitalization	9.19 billion USD	8.46 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	June 24, 1985	November 1, 2006
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DRS and OC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DRS vs. OC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	DRS	OC
5-Day Price Return	-2.16%	-1.49%
13-Week Price Return	-16.39%	-32.24%
26-Week Price Return	-14.27%	-28.60%
52-Week Price Return	-3.57%	-47.98%
Month-to-Date Return	-4.70%	-20.01%
Year-to-Date Return	7.83%	-40.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.41M	2.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.14M	1.11M
3-Month Volatility	33.52%	33.77%
Beta	0.45	1.39

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DRS

10.22%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 43.89%
Q3: 23.64%
Median: 12.98%
Q1: 8.07%
Min: -2.55%

DRS’s Return on Equity of 10.22% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

OC

-9.88%

Building Products Industry

Max: 46.90%
Q3: 27.23%
Median: 14.24%
Q1: 8.89%
Min: -11.14%

OC has a negative Return on Equity of -9.88%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

DRS vs. OC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DRS

7.43%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 14.96%
Q3: 9.50%
Median: 6.59%
Q1: 4.45%
Min: 1.01%

DRS’s Net Profit Margin of 7.43% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

OC

-4.46%

Building Products Industry

Max: 19.69%
Q3: 13.95%
Median: 8.32%
Q1: 4.11%
Min: -8.61%

OC has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.46%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

DRS vs. OC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DRS

9.58%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 17.97%
Q3: 12.09%
Median: 9.29%
Q1: 6.41%
Min: -1.59%

DRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.58% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

OC

3.18%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.30%
Q3: 17.93%
Median: 12.09%
Q1: 8.73%
Min: -3.72%

OC’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.18% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

DRS vs. OC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	DRS	OC
Return on Equity (TTM)	10.22%	-9.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)	6.38%	-3.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	7.43%	-4.46%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	9.58%	3.18%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	23.40%	29.42%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DRS

2.00

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 3.37
Q3: 2.01
Median: 1.22
Q1: 1.07
Min: 0.68

DRS’s Current Ratio of 2.00 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

OC

1.40

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.78
Q3: 1.93
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.31
Min: 0.93

OC’s Current Ratio of 1.40 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DRS vs. OC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DRS

0.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 1.89
Q3: 0.99
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.03

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, DRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

OC

1.17

Building Products Industry

Max: 1.75
Q3: 1.01
Median: 0.62
Q1: 0.16
Min: 0.00

OC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.17. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

DRS vs. OC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DRS

13.57

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 29.86
Q3: 19.49
Median: 7.09
Q1: 2.62
Min: -7.63

DRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

OC

5.32

Building Products Industry

Max: 72.12
Q3: 34.39
Median: 23.97
Q1: 7.29
Min: -2.48

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, OC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.32 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

DRS vs. OC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	DRS	OC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.00	1.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.60	0.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.13	1.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	13.57	5.32

Growth

Revenue Growth

DRS vs. OC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DRS vs. OC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DRS

0.79%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 2.87%
Q3: 1.46%
Median: 0.58%
Q1: 0.10%
Min: 0.00%

DRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.79% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

OC

2.74%

Building Products Industry

Max: 3.92%
Q3: 2.12%
Median: 1.27%
Q1: 0.78%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.74%, OC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Building Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

DRS vs. OC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DRS

40.91%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 110.40%
Q3: 51.46%
Median: 20.20%
Q1: 4.21%
Min: 0.00%

DRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.91% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

OC

16.23%

Building Products Industry

Max: 157.36%
Q3: 77.74%
Median: 29.96%
Q1: 18.92%
Min: 0.00%

OC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.23% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

DRS vs. OC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	DRS	OC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.79%	2.74%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	40.91%	16.23%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DRS

34.41

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 94.22
Q3: 53.31
Median: 32.27
Q1: 24.64
Min: 14.57

DRS’s P/E Ratio of 34.41 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

OC

Building Products Industry

Max: 41.45
Q3: 26.91
Median: 22.23
Q1: 16.60
Min: 9.49

P/E Ratio data for OC is currently unavailable.

DRS vs. OC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DRS

2.56

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 7.20
Q3: 3.95
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.71
Min: 0.32

DRS’s P/S Ratio of 2.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

OC

0.77

Building Products Industry

Max: 5.11
Q3: 2.85
Median: 1.60
Q1: 0.96
Min: 0.34

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, OC’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

DRS vs. OC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DRS

4.56

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 18.61
Q3: 9.58
Median: 5.45
Q1: 3.11
Min: 0.94

DRS’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

OC

2.69

Building Products Industry

Max: 10.99
Q3: 5.57
Median: 2.89
Q1: 1.85
Min: 0.66

OC’s P/B Ratio of 2.69 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

DRS vs. OC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	DRS	OC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	34.41	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.56	0.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.56	2.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	18.57	6.12