DRS vs. HUBB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 21, 2025

Here’s a clear look at DRS and HUBB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	DRS	HUBB
Company Name	Leonardo DRS, Inc.	Hubbell Incorporated
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Aerospace & Defense	Electrical Equipment
Market Capitalization	11.15 billion USD	23.59 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	June 24, 1985	June 5, 1972
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DRS and HUBB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DRS vs. HUBB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	DRS	HUBB
5-Day Price Return	1.58%	6.25%
13-Week Price Return	2.60%	17.32%
26-Week Price Return	22.34%	12.40%
52-Week Price Return	52.81%	18.94%
Month-to-Date Return	0.72%	1.48%
Year-to-Date Return	29.68%	5.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.39M	0.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.27M	0.63M
3-Month Volatility	36.51%	26.09%
Beta	0.55	0.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DRS

9.80%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 43.89%
Q3: 22.42%
Median: 12.50%
Q1: 5.21%
Min: -6.24%

DRS’s Return on Equity of 9.80% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HUBB

25.10%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 37.56%
Q3: 20.60%
Median: 14.38%
Q1: 4.35%
Min: 0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, HUBB’s Return on Equity of 25.10% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

DRS vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DRS

7.31%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 14.54%
Q3: 8.08%
Median: 6.17%
Q1: 2.49%
Min: -1.63%

DRS’s Net Profit Margin of 7.31% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HUBB

14.76%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 20.43%
Q3: 10.97%
Median: 6.07%
Q1: 3.16%
Min: 0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.76% places HUBB in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

DRS vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DRS

9.47%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 16.63%
Q3: 10.38%
Median: 8.29%
Q1: 6.21%
Min: 0.95%

DRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.47% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HUBB

20.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 26.20%
Q3: 14.31%
Median: 7.54%
Q1: 3.77%
Min: -5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.20% places HUBB in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

DRS vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	DRS	HUBB
Return on Equity (TTM)	9.80%	25.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)	6.17%	12.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	7.31%	14.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	9.47%	20.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	23.15%	34.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DRS

2.11

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 3.09
Q3: 1.98
Median: 1.23
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.02

DRS’s Current Ratio of 2.11 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

HUBB

1.30

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 3.02
Q3: 1.99
Median: 1.41
Q1: 1.07
Min: 0.80

HUBB’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DRS vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DRS

0.14

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 1.70
Q3: 1.04
Median: 0.68
Q1: 0.41
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, DRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HUBB

0.53

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 1.44
Q3: 0.99
Median: 0.56
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.00

HUBB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

DRS vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DRS

13.57

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 36.57
Q3: 19.90
Median: 7.04
Q1: 2.40
Min: -7.63

DRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HUBB

14.62

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 36.12
Q3: 19.29
Median: 9.38
Q1: 1.16
Min: -10.92

HUBB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.62 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DRS vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	DRS	HUBB
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.11	1.30
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.67	0.76
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.14	0.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	13.57	14.62

Growth

Revenue Growth

DRS vs. HUBB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DRS vs. HUBB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DRS

0.43%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 2.03%
Q3: 1.22%
Median: 0.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

DRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.43% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HUBB

1.19%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 2.20%
Q3: 1.53%
Median: 1.01%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

HUBB’s Dividend Yield of 1.19% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

DRS vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DRS

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 83.87%
Q3: 49.90%
Median: 16.48%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

DRS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HUBB

33.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 119.44%
Q3: 51.87%
Median: 27.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

HUBB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

DRS vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	DRS	HUBB
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.43%	1.19%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	33.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DRS

44.60

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 65.97
Q3: 54.11
Median: 34.53
Q1: 23.66
Min: 0.00

DRS’s P/E Ratio of 44.60 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HUBB

28.04

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 81.85
Q3: 44.17
Median: 27.61
Q1: 18.62
Min: 7.73

HUBB’s P/E Ratio of 28.04 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

DRS vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DRS

3.26

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 8.07
Q3: 4.49
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.39
Min: 0.00

DRS’s P/S Ratio of 3.26 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HUBB

4.14

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 8.18
Q3: 4.02
Median: 1.84
Q1: 0.97
Min: 0.44

HUBB’s P/S Ratio of 4.14 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

DRS vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DRS

4.76

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 13.67
Q3: 7.92
Median: 4.65
Q1: 2.68
Min: 0.82

DRS’s P/B Ratio of 4.76 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HUBB

6.25

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 8.50
Q3: 4.53
Median: 3.39
Q1: 1.70
Min: 0.51

HUBB’s P/B Ratio of 6.25 is in the upper tier for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

DRS vs. HUBB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	DRS	HUBB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	44.60	28.04
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	3.26	4.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.76	6.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	24.19	29.64