Seek Returns logo

DRI vs. MGA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DRI and MGA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDRIMGA
Company NameDarden Restaurants, Inc.Magna International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization24.19 billion USD12.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 9, 1995October 5, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DRI and MGA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DRI vs. MGA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDRIMGA
5-Day Price Return0.69%-0.60%
13-Week Price Return-0.59%20.18%
26-Week Price Return7.25%10.53%
52-Week Price Return38.62%9.35%
Month-to-Date Return2.89%8.47%
Year-to-Date Return11.14%2.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.96M0.92M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.36M1.51M
3-Month Volatility19.83%27.61%
Beta0.781.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DRI

48.09%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

In the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, DRI’s Return on Equity of 48.09% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

DRI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DRI

8.69%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

DRI’s Net Profit Margin of 8.69% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

DRI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DRI

11.28%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

DRI’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.28% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

DRI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDRIMGA
Return on Equity (TTM)48.09%10.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.56%3.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.69%2.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.28%4.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.88%13.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DRI

0.42

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

DRI’s Current Ratio of 0.42 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

DRI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DRI

1.62

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

DRI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.62 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

DRI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DRI

7.78

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

DRI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.78 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DRI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDRIMGA
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.421.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.160.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.620.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.788.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

DRI vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DRI vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DRI

2.70%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.70%, DRI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MGA

4.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.35%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

DRI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DRI

62.74%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DRI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 62.74% is in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

DRI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDRIMGA
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.70%4.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)62.74%44.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DRI

23.28

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

DRI’s P/E Ratio of 23.28 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MGA

10.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 10.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

DRI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DRI

2.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

DRI’s P/S Ratio of 2.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MGA

0.30

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.30 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

DRI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DRI

10.33

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

DRI’s P/B Ratio of 10.33 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

DRI vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDRIMGA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.2810.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.020.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.330.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.806.83