Seek Returns logo

DRI vs. IP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DRI and IP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDRIIP
Company NameDarden Restaurants, Inc.International Paper Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization22.38 billion USD24.42 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 9, 1995January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DRI and IP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DRI vs. IP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDRIIP
5-Day Price Return2.01%2.05%
13-Week Price Return-12.67%-6.47%
26-Week Price Return-8.24%-15.29%
52-Week Price Return14.19%-5.32%
Month-to-Date Return-8.01%-0.32%
Year-to-Date Return1.97%-14.07%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.20M3.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.34M4.09M
3-Month Volatility22.89%35.86%
Beta0.741.13

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DRI

48.09%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

In the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, DRI’s Return on Equity of 48.09% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IP

-0.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

IP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.20%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

DRI vs. IP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DRI

8.69%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

DRI’s Net Profit Margin of 8.69% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IP

-0.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

IP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.12%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

DRI vs. IP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DRI

11.28%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

DRI’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.28% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IP

-0.07%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

IP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.07%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

DRI vs. IP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDRIIP
Return on Equity (TTM)48.09%-0.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.56%-0.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.69%-0.12%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.28%-0.07%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.88%28.30%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DRI

0.42

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

DRI’s Current Ratio of 0.42 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

IP’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DRI vs. IP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DRI

1.62

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

DRI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.62 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IP

0.53

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

DRI vs. IP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DRI

7.78

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

DRI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.78 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IP

1.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, IP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

DRI vs. IP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDRIIP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.421.33
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.160.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.620.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.781.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

DRI vs. IP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DRI vs. IP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DRI

2.98%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.98%, DRI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

IP

3.31%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Yield of 3.31% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

DRI vs. IP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DRI

62.74%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DRI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 62.74% is in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

IP

180.00%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

IP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 180.00% is in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

DRI vs. IP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDRIIP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.98%3.31%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)62.74%180.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DRI

21.09

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

DRI’s P/E Ratio of 21.09 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IP

--

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

P/E Ratio data for IP is currently unavailable.

DRI vs. IP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DRI

1.83

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

DRI’s P/S Ratio of 1.83 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IP

1.12

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

IP’s P/S Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the market consensus for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DRI vs. IP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DRI

10.33

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

DRI’s P/B Ratio of 10.33 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IP

1.33

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

IP’s P/B Ratio of 1.33 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

DRI vs. IP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDRIIP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.09--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.831.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.331.33
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.5648.72