Seek Returns logo

DOCU vs. GFS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DOCU and GFS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDOCUGFS
Company NameDocuSign, Inc.GlobalFoundries Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization16.39 billion USD19.15 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateApril 27, 2018October 28, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DOCU and GFS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DOCU vs. GFS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDOCUGFS
5-Day Price Return-14.19%8.11%
13-Week Price Return-7.45%-6.18%
26-Week Price Return-17.05%-7.51%
52-Week Price Return16.90%-12.48%
Month-to-Date Return-5.96%7.34%
Year-to-Date Return-19.85%-16.48%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.39M4.67M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.21M2.37M
3-Month Volatility43.43%40.78%
Beta1.021.52

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DOCU

14.06%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

DOCU’s Return on Equity of 14.06% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GFS

-1.03%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

GFS has a negative Return on Equity of -1.03%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

DOCU vs. GFS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DOCU

9.08%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

DOCU’s Net Profit Margin of 9.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GFS

-1.68%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

GFS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.68%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

DOCU vs. GFS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DOCU

7.91%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

DOCU’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.91% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GFS

-2.47%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

GFS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.47%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

DOCU vs. GFS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDOCUGFS
Return on Equity (TTM)14.06%-1.03%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.17%-0.67%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.08%-1.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.91%-2.47%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.34%23.76%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DOCU

0.74

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

DOCU’s Current Ratio of 0.74 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GFS

2.63

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

GFS’s Current Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DOCU vs. GFS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DOCU

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

DOCU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GFS

0.15

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

GFS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

DOCU vs. GFS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DOCU

-47.58

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

DOCU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.58. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GFS

29.37

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

GFS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 29.37 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DOCU vs. GFS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDOCUGFS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.742.63
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.681.92
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-47.5829.37

Growth

Revenue Growth

DOCU vs. GFS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DOCU vs. GFS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DOCU

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DOCU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

DOCU vs. GFS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DOCU

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DOCU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

DOCU vs. GFS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDOCUGFS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DOCU

49.19

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

DOCU’s P/E Ratio of 49.19 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFS

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

P/E Ratio data for GFS is currently unavailable.

DOCU vs. GFS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DOCU

4.46

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, DOCU’s P/S Ratio of 4.46 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

GFS

2.79

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, GFS’s P/S Ratio of 2.79 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

DOCU vs. GFS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DOCU

7.69

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

DOCU’s P/B Ratio of 7.69 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GFS

1.86

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

GFS’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

DOCU vs. GFS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDOCUGFS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)49.19--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.462.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.691.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.7719.63