Seek Returns logo

DOCS vs. WAT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DOCS and WAT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDOCSWAT
Company NameDoximity, Inc.Waters Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care TechnologyLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization13.46 billion USD19.04 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 24, 2021November 17, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DOCS and WAT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DOCS vs. WAT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDOCSWAT
5-Day Price Return-1.51%2.45%
13-Week Price Return19.25%-14.10%
26-Week Price Return18.98%-18.48%
52-Week Price Return70.51%-16.10%
Month-to-Date Return7.67%-0.66%
Year-to-Date Return37.01%-19.18%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.59M0.81M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.70M0.73M
3-Month Volatility42.44%40.89%
Beta1.391.11

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DOCS

22.94%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
48.09%
Q3
41.80%
Median
18.17%
Q1
11.64%
Min
11.05%

DOCS’s Return on Equity of 22.94% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Technology industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WAT

35.02%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.51%
Median
6.47%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

WAT’s Return on Equity of 35.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

DOCS vs. WAT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DOCS

39.88%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
52.24%
Q3
49.15%
Median
33.59%
Q1
16.86%
Min
13.38%

DOCS’s Net Profit Margin of 39.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Technology industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

WAT

21.71%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
32.18%
Q3
18.30%
Median
10.19%
Q1
4.20%
Min
-2.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.71% places WAT in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

DOCS vs. WAT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DOCS

40.07%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
74.05%
Q3
65.56%
Median
33.50%
Q1
22.83%
Min
21.46%

DOCS’s Operating Profit Margin of 40.07% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Technology industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WAT

27.69%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
38.39%
Q3
21.40%
Median
13.57%
Q1
8.38%
Min
-3.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 27.69% places WAT in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

DOCS vs. WAT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDOCSWAT
Return on Equity (TTM)22.94%35.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.76%14.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)39.88%21.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)40.07%27.69%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)90.14%59.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DOCS

6.47

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
6.49
Q3
6.49
Median
6.02
Q1
3.62
Min
2.96

DOCS’s Current Ratio of 6.47 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Technology industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WAT

1.75

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
3.46
Q3
2.78
Median
1.91
Q1
1.53
Min
0.43

WAT’s Current Ratio of 1.75 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DOCS vs. WAT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Technology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DOCS

0.00

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
0.14
Q3
0.10
Median
0.01
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Technology industry, DOCS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

WAT

0.67

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

WAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

DOCS vs. WAT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Technology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DOCS

--

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
224.12
Q3
224.12
Median
219.00
Q1
219.00
Min
219.00

Interest Coverage Ratio data for DOCS is currently unavailable.

WAT

11.29

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

WAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.29 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DOCS vs. WAT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDOCSWAT
Current Ratio (MRQ)6.471.75
Quick Ratio (MRQ)6.201.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--11.29

Growth

Revenue Growth

DOCS vs. WAT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DOCS vs. WAT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DOCS

0.00%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
0.89%
Q3
0.70%
Median
0.15%
Q1
0.04%
Min
0.00%

DOCS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

WAT

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.41%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WAT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

DOCS vs. WAT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DOCS

0.00%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
101.92%
Q3
87.10%
Median
42.63%
Q1
10.66%
Min
0.00%

DOCS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

WAT

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
113.14%
Q3
61.34%
Median
17.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WAT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

DOCS vs. WAT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDOCSWAT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DOCS

56.28

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
280.41
Q3
225.12
Median
59.01
Q1
44.08
Min
39.20

DOCS’s P/E Ratio of 56.28 is within the middle range for the Health Care Technology industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WAT

27.55

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
75.35
Q3
51.00
Median
32.93
Q1
25.27
Min
1.43

WAT’s P/E Ratio of 27.55 is within the middle range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

DOCS vs. WAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DOCS

22.44

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
146.49
Q3
115.78
Median
19.83
Q1
7.94
Min
5.25

DOCS’s P/S Ratio of 22.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Technology industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WAT

5.98

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.49
Q3
6.43
Median
4.66
Q1
2.88
Min
1.08

WAT’s P/S Ratio of 5.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DOCS vs. WAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DOCS

11.22

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
115.01
Q3
89.07
Median
9.11
Q1
4.04
Min
3.06

DOCS’s P/B Ratio of 11.22 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Technology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

WAT

9.62

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
6.69
Q3
5.00
Median
3.46
Q1
2.38
Min
0.93

At 9.62, WAT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

DOCS vs. WAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Technology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDOCSWAT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)56.2827.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)22.445.98
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)11.229.62
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)46.0529.42