Seek Returns logo

DOCS vs. RGC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DOCS and RGC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDOCSRGC
Company NameDoximity, Inc.Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesHong Kong
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care TechnologyPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization13.46 billion USD7.83 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqCM
Listing DateJune 24, 2021July 16, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DOCS and RGC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DOCS vs. RGC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDOCSRGC
5-Day Price Return-1.51%5.97%
13-Week Price Return19.25%-9.33%
26-Week Price Return18.98%1,414.71%
52-Week Price Return70.51%10,200.00%
Month-to-Date Return7.67%9.96%
Year-to-Date Return37.01%11,784.62%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.59M0.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.70M1.06M
3-Month Volatility42.44%266.49%
Beta1.392.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DOCS

22.94%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
48.09%
Q3
41.80%
Median
18.17%
Q1
11.64%
Min
11.05%

DOCS’s Return on Equity of 22.94% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Technology industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RGC

-54.75%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.85%
Q1
5.40%
Min
-10.91%

RGC has a negative Return on Equity of -54.75%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

DOCS vs. RGC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DOCS

39.88%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
52.24%
Q3
49.15%
Median
33.59%
Q1
16.86%
Min
13.38%

DOCS’s Net Profit Margin of 39.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Technology industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RGC

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
40.67%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.31%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-9.91%

Net Profit Margin data for RGC is currently unavailable.

DOCS vs. RGC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DOCS

40.07%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
74.05%
Q3
65.56%
Median
33.50%
Q1
22.83%
Min
21.46%

DOCS’s Operating Profit Margin of 40.07% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Technology industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RGC

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.78%
Q3
23.14%
Median
16.68%
Q1
7.98%
Min
-7.13%

Operating Profit Margin data for RGC is currently unavailable.

DOCS vs. RGC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDOCSRGC
Return on Equity (TTM)22.94%-54.75%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.76%-51.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)39.88%--
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)40.07%--
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)90.14%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DOCS

6.47

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
6.49
Q3
6.49
Median
6.02
Q1
3.62
Min
2.96

DOCS’s Current Ratio of 6.47 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Technology industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RGC

42.68

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.65
Q3
2.64
Median
1.85
Q1
1.26
Min
0.78

RGC’s Current Ratio of 42.68 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

DOCS vs. RGC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Technology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DOCS

0.00

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
0.14
Q3
0.10
Median
0.01
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Technology industry, DOCS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

RGC

0.00

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.82
Median
0.35
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, RGC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

DOCS vs. RGC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Technology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DOCS

--

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
224.12
Q3
224.12
Median
219.00
Q1
219.00
Min
219.00

Interest Coverage Ratio data for DOCS is currently unavailable.

RGC

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
43.60
Median
9.83
Q1
2.37
Min
-42.71

Interest Coverage Ratio data for RGC is currently unavailable.

DOCS vs. RGC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDOCSRGC
Current Ratio (MRQ)6.4742.68
Quick Ratio (MRQ)6.2041.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

DOCS vs. RGC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DOCS vs. RGC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DOCS

0.00%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
0.89%
Q3
0.70%
Median
0.15%
Q1
0.04%
Min
0.00%

DOCS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RGC

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
3.45%
Median
2.17%
Q1
0.33%
Min
0.00%

RGC currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

DOCS vs. RGC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DOCS

0.00%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
101.92%
Q3
87.10%
Median
42.63%
Q1
10.66%
Min
0.00%

DOCS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RGC

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
199.58%
Q3
97.17%
Median
53.47%
Q1
22.97%
Min
0.00%

RGC has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

DOCS vs. RGC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDOCSRGC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DOCS

56.28

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
280.41
Q3
225.12
Median
59.01
Q1
44.08
Min
39.20

DOCS’s P/E Ratio of 56.28 is within the middle range for the Health Care Technology industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RGC

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.19
Q3
27.91
Median
20.59
Q1
15.08
Min
3.79

P/E Ratio data for RGC is currently unavailable.

DOCS vs. RGC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DOCS

22.44

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
146.49
Q3
115.78
Median
19.83
Q1
7.94
Min
5.25

DOCS’s P/S Ratio of 22.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Technology industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RGC

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
8.87
Q3
4.56
Median
2.14
Q1
1.58
Min
0.11

P/S Ratio data for RGC is currently unavailable.

DOCS vs. RGC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Technology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DOCS

11.22

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
115.01
Q3
89.07
Median
9.11
Q1
4.04
Min
3.06

DOCS’s P/B Ratio of 11.22 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Technology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RGC

9.57

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.99
Median
2.48
Q1
1.53
Min
0.59

RGC’s P/B Ratio of 9.57 is in the upper tier for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

DOCS vs. RGC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Technology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDOCSRGC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)56.28--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)22.44--
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)11.229.57
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)46.05--