DNB vs. FDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 19, 2025

Here’s a clear look at DNB and FDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	DNB	FDS
Company Name	Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc.	FactSet Research Systems Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Financials
GICS Industry	Professional Services	Capital Markets
Market Capitalization	4.06 billion USD	14.22 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	July 1, 2020	June 28, 1996
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DNB and FDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DNB vs. FDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	DNB	FDS
5-Day Price Return	0.00%	-2.71%
13-Week Price Return	1.34%	-17.57%
26-Week Price Return	-24.98%	-19.83%
52-Week Price Return	-21.28%	-5.25%
Month-to-Date Return	0.00%	-6.63%
Year-to-Date Return	-26.97%	-21.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.77M	0.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume	9.41M	0.35M
3-Month Volatility	2.32%	20.09%
Beta	1.19	0.84

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DNB

-0.64%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 52.17%
Q3: 30.06%
Median: 22.21%
Q1: 11.67%
Min: -13.44%

DNB has a negative Return on Equity of -0.64%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

FDS

26.26%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FDS’s Return on Equity of 26.26% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

DNB vs. FDS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DNB

-0.88%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 26.06%
Q3: 13.34%
Median: 7.88%
Q1: 3.50%
Min: -2.93%

DNB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.88%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

FDS

23.30%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

FDS’s Net Profit Margin of 23.30% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

DNB vs. FDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DNB

8.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 35.84%
Q3: 19.38%
Median: 12.54%
Q1: 7.36%
Min: -5.21%

DNB’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.91% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FDS

30.56%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

FDS’s Operating Profit Margin of 30.56% is around the midpoint for the Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

DNB vs. FDS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	DNB	FDS
Return on Equity (TTM)	-0.64%	26.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-0.24%	12.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-0.88%	23.30%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	8.91%	30.56%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	62.31%	53.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DNB

0.62

Professional Services Industry

Max: 2.45
Q3: 1.65
Median: 1.26
Q1: 1.10
Min: 0.47

DNB’s Current Ratio of 0.62 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FDS

1.47

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

DNB vs. FDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DNB

1.07

Professional Services Industry

Max: 2.63
Q3: 1.44
Median: 0.91
Q1: 0.49
Min: 0.00

DNB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FDS

0.66

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

DNB vs. FDS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DNB

0.76

Professional Services Industry

Max: 39.67
Q3: 20.05
Median: 11.07
Q1: 5.36
Min: -2.22

DNB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.76 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

FDS

13.69

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

DNB vs. FDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	DNB	FDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.62	1.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.46	1.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.07	0.66
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	0.76	13.69

Growth

Revenue Growth

DNB vs. FDS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DNB vs. FDS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DNB

2.15%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 5.28%
Q3: 2.51%
Median: 1.63%
Q1: 0.62%
Min: 0.00%

DNB’s Dividend Yield of 2.15% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FDS

1.11%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

FDS’s Dividend Yield of 1.11% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

DNB vs. FDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DNB

396.36%

Professional Services Industry

Max: 109.23%
Q3: 64.39%
Median: 47.00%
Q1: 20.35%
Min: 0.00%

At 396.36%, DNB’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Professional Services industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

FDS

29.59%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

FDS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.59% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

DNB vs. FDS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	DNB	FDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.15%	1.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	396.36%	29.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DNB

Professional Services Industry

Max: 49.59
Q3: 36.59
Median: 28.13
Q1: 18.55
Min: 10.07

P/E Ratio data for DNB is currently unavailable.

FDS

26.71

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

FDS’s P/E Ratio of 26.71 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

DNB vs. FDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DNB

1.69

Professional Services Industry

Max: 9.54
Q3: 5.11
Median: 2.10
Q1: 0.75
Min: 0.11

DNB’s P/S Ratio of 1.69 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FDS

6.22

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

FDS’s P/S Ratio of 6.22 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DNB vs. FDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DNB

1.21

Professional Services Industry

Max: 13.75
Q3: 8.87
Median: 4.35
Q1: 2.43
Min: 0.54

DNB’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FDS

8.04

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

FDS’s P/B Ratio of 8.04 is in the upper tier for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

DNB vs. FDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	DNB	FDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	26.71
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.69	6.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.21	8.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	17.71	24.69