Seek Returns logo

DKNG vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DKNG and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

DKNG is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolDKNGVIPS
Company NameDraftKings Inc.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization21.43 billion USD8.42 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 25, 2019March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DKNG and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DKNG vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDKNGVIPS
5-Day Price Return-4.51%8.20%
13-Week Price Return13.79%10.54%
26-Week Price Return1.70%7.49%
52-Week Price Return44.59%16.61%
Month-to-Date Return-4.17%8.42%
Year-to-Date Return16.02%21.46%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.46M2.58M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.23M3.43M
3-Month Volatility39.11%33.51%
Beta2.060.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DKNG

-30.68%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

DKNG has a negative Return on Equity of -30.68%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

DKNG vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DKNG

-5.63%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

DKNG has a negative Net Profit Margin of -5.63%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

DKNG vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DKNG

-6.16%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

DKNG has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -6.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

DKNG vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDKNGVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)-30.68%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)-6.94%10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-5.63%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-6.16%8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.45%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DKNG

1.34

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

DKNG’s Current Ratio of 1.34 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DKNG vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DKNG

1.82

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

DKNG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.82 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

DKNG vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DKNG

-1,118.91

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

DKNG has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1,118.91. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

DKNG vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDKNGVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.341.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.271.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.820.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-1,118.91150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

DKNG vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DKNG vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DKNG

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DKNG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

DKNG vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DKNG

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DKNG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

DKNG vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDKNGVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DKNG

--

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

P/E Ratio data for DKNG is currently unavailable.

VIPS

7.88

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.88 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

DKNG vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DKNG

3.96

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

DKNG’s P/S Ratio of 3.96 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIPS

0.54

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.54 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

DKNG vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DKNG

21.08

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

At 21.08, DKNG’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

DKNG vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDKNGVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--7.88
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.960.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)21.081.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)39.47--