Seek Returns logo

DIS vs. SAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DIS and SAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

DIS is a standard domestic listing, while SAP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolDISSAP
Company NameThe Walt Disney CompanySAP SE
CountryUnited StatesGermany
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryEntertainmentSoftware
Market Capitalization202.21 billion USD315.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962September 18, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DIS and SAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DIS vs. SAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDISSAP
5-Day Price Return-2.01%2.04%
13-Week Price Return-9.30%-11.87%
26-Week Price Return13.95%-7.61%
52-Week Price Return19.46%14.90%
Month-to-Date Return-1.77%0.99%
Year-to-Date Return1.01%-2.60%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.41M1.32M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.55M1.48M
3-Month Volatility16.87%29.37%
Beta1.510.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DIS

11.10%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

DIS’s Return on Equity of 11.10% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SAP

15.09%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

SAP’s Return on Equity of 15.09% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

DIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DIS

12.22%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

DIS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.22% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SAP

18.23%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

SAP’s Net Profit Margin of 18.23% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

DIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DIS

12.69%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

DIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.69% is around the midpoint for the Entertainment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SAP

25.13%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.13% places SAP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

DIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDISSAP
Return on Equity (TTM)11.10%15.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.88%9.09%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.22%18.23%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.69%25.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)37.61%73.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DIS

0.72

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

DIS’s Current Ratio of 0.72 falls into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SAP

1.03

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

SAP’s Current Ratio of 1.03 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DIS

0.39

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

DIS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SAP

0.21

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

SAP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

DIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DIS

7.95

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

DIS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.95 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SAP

32.64

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

SAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 32.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDISSAP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.721.03
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.661.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.390.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.9532.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

DIS vs. SAP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DIS vs. SAP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DIS

0.85%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DIS’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is consistent with its peers in the Entertainment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SAP

1.01%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.01% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

DIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DIS

46.10%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.10% is in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SAP

161.64%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 161.64%, SAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

DIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDISSAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.85%1.01%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)46.10%161.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DIS

17.59

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, DIS’s P/E Ratio of 17.59 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SAP

41.41

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

SAP’s P/E Ratio of 41.41 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

DIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DIS

2.15

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, DIS’s P/S Ratio of 2.15 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SAP

7.55

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

SAP’s P/S Ratio of 7.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DIS

2.04

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

DIS’s P/B Ratio of 2.04 is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SAP

7.74

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

SAP’s P/B Ratio of 7.74 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

DIS vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDISSAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)17.5941.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.157.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.047.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.6037.05