Seek Returns logo

DIS vs. MA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DIS and MA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDISMA
Company NameThe Walt Disney CompanyMastercard Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesFinancials
GICS IndustryEntertainmentFinancial Services
Market Capitalization209.71 billion USD522.43 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962May 25, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DIS and MA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DIS vs. MA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDISMA
5-Day Price Return3.33%2.97%
13-Week Price Return5.57%-0.06%
26-Week Price Return4.06%1.89%
52-Week Price Return35.71%26.82%
Month-to-Date Return-2.07%2.02%
Year-to-Date Return4.75%9.75%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.20M2.89M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.42M2.85M
3-Month Volatility20.10%21.86%
Beta1.570.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DIS

11.10%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

DIS’s Return on Equity of 11.10% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MA

191.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

MA’s Return on Equity of 191.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

DIS vs. MA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DIS

12.22%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

DIS’s Net Profit Margin of 12.22% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MA

44.93%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

A Net Profit Margin of 44.93% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

DIS vs. MA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DIS

12.69%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

DIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.69% is around the midpoint for the Entertainment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MA

55.78%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 55.78% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

DIS vs. MA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDISMA
Return on Equity (TTM)11.10%191.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.88%27.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.22%44.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.69%55.78%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)37.61%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DIS

0.72

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

DIS’s Current Ratio of 0.72 falls into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MA

1.16

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

DIS vs. MA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DIS

0.39

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

DIS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MA

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

DIS vs. MA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DIS

7.95

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

DIS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.95 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MA

37.93

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

DIS vs. MA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDISMA
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.721.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.661.16
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.392.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.9537.93

Growth

Revenue Growth

DIS vs. MA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DIS vs. MA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DIS

0.83%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DIS’s Dividend Yield of 0.83% is consistent with its peers in the Entertainment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MA

0.50%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MA’s Dividend Yield of 0.50% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

DIS vs. MA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DIS

46.10%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.10% is in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MA

19.15%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.15% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

DIS vs. MA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDISMA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.83%0.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)46.10%19.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DIS

18.03

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, DIS’s P/E Ratio of 18.03 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MA

38.51

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

A P/E Ratio of 38.51 places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

DIS vs. MA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DIS

2.20

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, DIS’s P/S Ratio of 2.20 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MA

17.30

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

DIS vs. MA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DIS

2.04

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

DIS’s P/B Ratio of 2.04 is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MA

64.98

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

At 64.98, MA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

DIS vs. MA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDISMA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.0338.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.2017.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.0464.98
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.0332.97