Seek Returns logo

DHR vs. TAK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DHR and TAK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

DHR is a standard domestic listing, while TAK trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolDHRTAK
Company NameDanaher CorporationTakeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryLife Sciences Tools & ServicesPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization149.76 billion USD46.65 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 29, 1978January 5, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DHR and TAK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DHR vs. TAK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDHRTAK
5-Day Price Return5.37%2.78%
13-Week Price Return4.14%5.93%
26-Week Price Return-0.41%5.75%
52-Week Price Return-21.73%5.51%
Month-to-Date Return6.08%3.74%
Year-to-Date Return-8.89%4.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.84M5.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.21M4.67M
3-Month Volatility30.98%15.38%
Beta0.790.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DHR

6.69%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

DHR’s Return on Equity of 6.69% is on par with the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TAK

1.48%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

TAK’s Return on Equity of 1.48% is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

DHR vs. TAK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DHR

14.21%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

DHR’s Net Profit Margin of 14.21% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TAK

2.36%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TAK’s Net Profit Margin of 2.36% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

DHR vs. TAK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DHR

18.43%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

DHR’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.43% is around the midpoint for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TAK

7.48%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

TAK’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.48% is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

DHR vs. TAK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDHRTAK
Return on Equity (TTM)6.69%1.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.28%0.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.21%2.36%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.43%7.48%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.72%65.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DHR

1.62

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

DHR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TAK

1.01

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

TAK’s Current Ratio of 1.01 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

DHR vs. TAK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DHR

0.33

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

DHR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TAK

0.65

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

TAK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

DHR vs. TAK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DHR

22.31

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

DHR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TAK

2.05

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TAK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

DHR vs. TAK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDHRTAK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.621.01
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.100.52
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.330.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)22.312.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

DHR vs. TAK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DHR vs. TAK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DHR

0.55%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DHR’s Dividend Yield of 0.55% is consistent with its peers in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TAK

4.39%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.39%, TAK offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

DHR vs. TAK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DHR

23.85%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DHR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 23.85% is within the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TAK

138.69%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

TAK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 138.69% is in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

DHR vs. TAK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDHRTAK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.55%4.39%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)23.85%138.69%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DHR

43.76

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

DHR’s P/E Ratio of 43.76 is within the middle range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TAK

63.81

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

At 63.81, TAK’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

DHR vs. TAK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DHR

6.22

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

DHR’s P/S Ratio of 6.22 aligns with the market consensus for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TAK

1.50

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TAK’s P/S Ratio of 1.50 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

DHR vs. TAK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DHR

2.72

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

DHR’s P/B Ratio of 2.72 is within the conventional range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TAK

1.01

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

TAK’s P/B Ratio of 1.01 is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

DHR vs. TAK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDHRTAK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)43.7663.81
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.221.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.721.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.729.71