Seek Returns logo

DECK vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DECK and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

DECK is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolDECKVIPS
Company NameDeckers Outdoor CorporationVipshop Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization15.80 billion USD8.42 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 15, 1993March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DECK and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DECK vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDECKVIPS
5-Day Price Return4.50%8.20%
13-Week Price Return-15.55%10.54%
26-Week Price Return-38.16%7.49%
52-Week Price Return-30.43%16.61%
Month-to-Date Return0.29%8.42%
Year-to-Date Return-47.57%21.46%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.57M2.58M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.58M3.43M
3-Month Volatility59.09%33.51%
Beta1.100.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DECK

40.25%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Return on Equity of 40.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

DECK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

19.31%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.31% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

DECK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

23.64%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.64% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

DECK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDECKVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)40.25%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)26.80%10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.31%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.64%8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.63%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

2.94

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

DECK’s Current Ratio of 2.94 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DECK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

DECK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DECK

713.03

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 713.03, DECK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

DECK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDECKVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.941.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.081.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)713.03150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

DECK vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DECK vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

DECK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

DECK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

DECK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

DECK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDECKVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DECK

15.69

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

DECK’s P/E Ratio of 15.69 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIPS

7.88

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.88 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

DECK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DECK

3.03

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

DECK’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VIPS

0.54

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.54 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

DECK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

6.24

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

DECK’s P/B Ratio of 6.24 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

DECK vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDECKVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.697.88
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.030.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.241.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.34--