Seek Returns logo

DECK vs. TPR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DECK and TPR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDECKTPR
Company NameDeckers Outdoor CorporationTapestry, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization12.20 billion USD21.07 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 15, 1993October 6, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DECK and TPR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DECK vs. TPR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDECKTPR
5-Day Price Return3.73%-4.40%
13-Week Price Return-19.56%0.67%
26-Week Price Return-35.98%21.30%
52-Week Price Return-53.56%97.83%
Month-to-Date Return1.62%-7.66%
Year-to-Date Return-59.22%55.23%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.74M4.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.79M3.68M
3-Month Volatility47.28%37.94%
Beta1.191.69

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DECK

40.32%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
46.95%
Q3
26.41%
Median
17.82%
Q1
9.41%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Return on Equity of 40.32% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TPR

26.56%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
46.95%
Q3
26.41%
Median
17.82%
Q1
9.41%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Return on Equity of 26.56% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

DECK vs. TPR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

19.37%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
7.68%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.37% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TPR

3.77%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
7.68%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-3.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.77% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

DECK vs. TPR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

23.51%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
28.42%
Q3
20.87%
Median
12.08%
Q1
6.65%
Min
-0.12%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.51% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TPR

5.15%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
28.42%
Q3
20.87%
Median
12.08%
Q1
6.65%
Min
-0.12%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.15% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

DECK vs. TPR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDECKTPR
Return on Equity (TTM)40.32%26.56%
Return on Assets (TTM)26.81%3.95%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.37%3.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.51%5.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.66%75.67%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

3.07

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.07
Q3
2.20
Median
1.62
Q1
1.47
Min
0.70

DECK’s Current Ratio of 3.07 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TPR

1.52

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.07
Q3
2.20
Median
1.62
Q1
1.47
Min
0.70

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.52 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DECK vs. TPR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
1.30
Median
0.59
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TPR

6.60

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
1.30
Median
0.59
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 6.60, TPR operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

DECK vs. TPR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DECK

713.03

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
85.38
Q3
37.37
Median
8.62
Q1
4.18
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 713.03, DECK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TPR

3.53

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
85.38
Q3
37.37
Median
8.62
Q1
4.18
Min
-32.49

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.53 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

DECK vs. TPR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDECKTPR
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.071.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.150.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.006.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)713.033.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

DECK vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DECK vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.60%
Q3
3.43%
Median
2.28%
Q1
1.12%
Min
0.00%

DECK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TPR

1.45%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.60%
Q3
3.43%
Median
2.28%
Q1
1.12%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Yield of 1.45% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

DECK vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
96.75%
Median
57.64%
Q1
34.78%
Min
0.00%

DECK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TPR

28.97%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
96.75%
Median
57.64%
Q1
34.78%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.97% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

DECK vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDECKTPR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.45%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%28.97%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DECK

11.88

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
76.57
Q3
39.44
Median
22.87
Q1
14.62
Min
7.99

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s P/E Ratio of 11.88 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TPR

76.57

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
76.57
Q3
39.44
Median
22.87
Q1
14.62
Min
7.99

A P/E Ratio of 76.57 places TPR in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

DECK vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DECK

2.30

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.88
Median
1.80
Q1
0.93
Min
0.28

DECK’s P/S Ratio of 2.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TPR

2.88

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.88
Median
1.80
Q1
0.93
Min
0.28

TPR’s P/S Ratio of 2.88 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DECK vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

6.10

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
11.14
Q3
5.70
Median
3.35
Q1
2.02
Min
0.56

DECK’s P/B Ratio of 6.10 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TPR

57.75

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
11.14
Q3
5.70
Median
3.35
Q1
2.02
Min
0.56

At 57.75, TPR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

DECK vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDECKTPR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.8876.57
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.302.88
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.1057.75
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.1419.67