Seek Returns logo

DECK vs. SCI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DECK and SCI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDECKSCI
Company NameDeckers Outdoor CorporationService Corporation International
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsDiversified Consumer Services
Market Capitalization11.64 billion USD11.23 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 15, 1993March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DECK and SCI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DECK vs. SCI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDECKSCI
5-Day Price Return0.38%-1.83%
13-Week Price Return-20.53%-0.22%
26-Week Price Return-33.94%5.34%
52-Week Price Return-53.40%-6.78%
Month-to-Date Return-2.04%-4.05%
Year-to-Date Return-60.69%0.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.95M1.21M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.75M1.01M
3-Month Volatility47.47%19.37%
Beta1.201.00

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DECK

40.29%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Return on Equity of 40.29% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SCI

33.12%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
32.84%
Q3
21.21%
Median
13.32%
Q1
11.02%
Min
0.11%

SCI’s Return on Equity of 33.12% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

DECK vs. SCI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

19.35%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.35% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SCI

12.46%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
20.09%
Q3
13.26%
Median
12.53%
Q1
7.59%
Min
0.13%

SCI’s Net Profit Margin of 12.46% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

DECK vs. SCI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

23.51%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.51% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SCI

22.48%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
26.98%
Q3
22.01%
Median
15.97%
Q1
9.54%
Min
0.80%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.48% places SCI in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

DECK vs. SCI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDECKSCI
Return on Equity (TTM)40.29%33.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)26.79%3.01%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.35%12.46%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.51%22.48%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.66%26.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

3.07

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

DECK’s Current Ratio of 3.07 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SCI

0.56

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
2.31
Median
1.58
Q1
0.90
Min
0.46

SCI’s Current Ratio of 0.56 falls into the lower quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

DECK vs. SCI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SCI

3.21

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.64
Median
0.19
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.21, SCI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Diversified Consumer Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

DECK vs. SCI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DECK

713.03

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 713.03, DECK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SCI

3.62

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
54.22
Q3
32.36
Median
10.70
Q1
4.19
Min
1.66

In the lower quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry, SCI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.62 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

DECK vs. SCI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDECKSCI
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.070.56
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.200.52
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.003.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)713.033.62

Growth

Revenue Growth

DECK vs. SCI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DECK vs. SCI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

DECK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SCI

1.60%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
2.95%
Q3
1.55%
Median
0.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.60%, SCI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Diversified Consumer Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

DECK vs. SCI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

DECK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SCI

33.57%

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
52.37%
Q3
25.79%
Median
0.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SCI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.57% is in the upper quartile for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

DECK vs. SCI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDECKSCI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.60%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%33.57%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DECK

11.74

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s P/E Ratio of 11.74 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SCI

20.99

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
38.85
Q3
31.29
Median
22.33
Q1
15.56
Min
7.57

SCI’s P/E Ratio of 20.99 is within the middle range for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

DECK vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DECK

2.27

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

DECK’s P/S Ratio of 2.27 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SCI

2.62

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.78
Min
1.07

SCI’s P/S Ratio of 2.62 aligns with the market consensus for the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DECK vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

6.10

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

DECK’s P/B Ratio of 6.10 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SCI

7.45

Diversified Consumer Services Industry

Max
7.43
Q3
5.06
Median
3.19
Q1
1.95
Min
0.95

At 7.45, SCI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Diversified Consumer Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

DECK vs. SCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Diversified Consumer Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDECKSCI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.7420.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.272.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.107.45
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.0018.13