Seek Returns logo

DECK vs. MGA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DECK and MGA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDECKMGA
Company NameDeckers Outdoor CorporationMagna International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization12.20 billion USD13.81 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 15, 1993October 5, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DECK and MGA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DECK vs. MGA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDECKMGA
5-Day Price Return3.73%-0.06%
13-Week Price Return-19.56%11.54%
26-Week Price Return-35.98%35.42%
52-Week Price Return-53.56%11.13%
Month-to-Date Return1.62%3.98%
Year-to-Date Return-59.22%14.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.74M1.30M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.79M1.01M
3-Month Volatility47.28%26.93%
Beta1.191.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DECK

40.32%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
46.95%
Q3
26.41%
Median
17.82%
Q1
9.41%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Return on Equity of 40.32% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MGA

8.55%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.69%
Q3
11.79%
Median
7.47%
Q1
4.51%
Min
-2.79%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 8.55% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

DECK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

19.37%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
7.68%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.37% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MGA

2.47%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.12%
Q3
7.20%
Median
4.94%
Q1
1.95%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.47% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

DECK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

23.51%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
28.42%
Q3
20.87%
Median
12.08%
Q1
6.65%
Min
-0.12%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.51% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MGA

3.77%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
19.04%
Q3
10.47%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.48%
Min
-2.44%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.77% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

DECK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDECKMGA
Return on Equity (TTM)40.32%8.55%
Return on Assets (TTM)26.81%3.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.37%2.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.51%3.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.66%13.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

3.07

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.07
Q3
2.20
Median
1.62
Q1
1.47
Min
0.70

DECK’s Current Ratio of 3.07 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MGA

1.18

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.42
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.18 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

DECK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
1.30
Median
0.59
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MGA

0.43

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.66
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.43 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

DECK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DECK

713.03

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
85.38
Q3
37.37
Median
8.62
Q1
4.18
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 713.03, DECK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
36.86
Median
11.36
Q1
4.46
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DECK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDECKMGA
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.071.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.150.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)713.038.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

DECK vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DECK vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.60%
Q3
3.43%
Median
2.28%
Q1
1.12%
Min
0.00%

DECK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MGA

3.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
3.13%
Median
2.50%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.91%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

DECK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
96.75%
Median
57.64%
Q1
34.78%
Min
0.00%

DECK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MGA

52.47%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
62.52%
Median
37.81%
Q1
27.27%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 52.47% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

DECK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDECKMGA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%52.47%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DECK

11.88

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
76.57
Q3
39.44
Median
22.87
Q1
14.62
Min
7.99

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s P/E Ratio of 11.88 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MGA

13.40

Automobile Components Industry

Max
28.01
Q3
22.74
Median
15.58
Q1
12.96
Min
2.71

MGA’s P/E Ratio of 13.40 is within the middle range for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

DECK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DECK

2.30

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.88
Median
1.80
Q1
0.93
Min
0.28

DECK’s P/S Ratio of 2.30 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MGA

0.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.05
Q3
1.12
Median
0.78
Q1
0.46
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.33 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

DECK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

6.10

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
11.14
Q3
5.70
Median
3.35
Q1
2.02
Min
0.56

DECK’s P/B Ratio of 6.10 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MGA

1.05

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.68
Q3
2.06
Median
1.25
Q1
0.90
Min
0.46

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 1.05 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

DECK vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDECKMGA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.8813.40
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.300.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.101.05
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.146.22