DECK vs. LEN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 5, 2025

Here’s a clear look at DECK and LEN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	DECK	LEN
Company Name	Deckers Outdoor Corporation	Lennar Corporation
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods	Household Durables
Market Capitalization	15.29 billion USD	33.51 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	October 15, 1993	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DECK and LEN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DECK vs. LEN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	DECK	LEN
5-Day Price Return	-0.22%	1.87%
13-Week Price Return	-2.97%	18.12%
26-Week Price Return	-7.83%	13.32%
52-Week Price Return	-34.64%	-27.66%
Month-to-Date Return	1.66%	3.20%
Year-to-Date Return	-49.26%	-0.74%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.88M	3.16M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.20M	3.41M
3-Month Volatility	40.82%	37.85%
Beta	1.24	1.43

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DECK

40.25%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 42.05%
Q3: 24.41%
Median: 17.18%
Q1: 7.87%
Min: -8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Return on Equity of 40.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LEN

12.95%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 27.70%
Q3: 17.40%
Median: 12.87%
Q1: 7.33%
Min: -5.50%

LEN’s Return on Equity of 12.95% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

DECK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

19.31%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 21.16%
Q3: 13.26%
Median: 6.06%
Q1: 3.93%
Min: -3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.31% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LEN

9.20%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 16.37%
Q3: 9.18%
Median: 6.63%
Q1: 3.85%
Min: -3.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.20% places LEN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

DECK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

23.64%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 29.47%
Q3: 20.87%
Median: 11.68%
Q1: 6.26%
Min: -0.12%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.64% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LEN

12.25%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 21.32%
Q3: 12.25%
Median: 9.93%
Q1: 5.57%
Min: -1.07%

LEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.25% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

DECK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	DECK	LEN
Return on Equity (TTM)	40.25%	12.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)	26.80%	8.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	19.31%	9.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	23.64%	12.25%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	57.63%	13.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

2.94

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 2.94
Q3: 2.22
Median: 1.61
Q1: 1.48
Min: 0.74

DECK’s Current Ratio of 2.94 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LEN

7.62

Household Durables Industry

Max: 6.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 2.54
Q1: 1.23
Min: 0.83

LEN’s Current Ratio of 7.62 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

DECK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 2.79
Q3: 1.32
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LEN

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.89
Q3: 0.87
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.19
Min: 0.00

LEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

DECK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DECK

713.03

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 57.00
Q3: 32.83
Median: 7.87
Q1: 3.52
Min: -32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 713.03, DECK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LEN

11.93

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 77.14
Median: 24.53
Q1: 5.69
Min: -17.01

LEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DECK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	DECK	LEN
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.94	7.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	2.08	1.02
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.00	0.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	713.03	11.93

Growth

Revenue Growth

DECK vs. LEN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DECK vs. LEN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 5.22%
Q3: 3.07%
Median: 2.34%
Q1: 1.11%
Min: 0.00%

DECK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LEN

1.60%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 9.61%
Q3: 3.97%
Median: 2.00%
Q1: 0.18%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Yield of 1.60% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

DECK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 156.63%
Q3: 94.60%
Median: 52.65%
Q1: 35.04%
Min: 0.00%

DECK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LEN

16.45%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 129.55%
Q3: 65.55%
Median: 42.15%
Q1: 6.45%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.45% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

DECK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	DECK	LEN
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	1.60%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	16.45%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DECK

15.56

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 48.15
Q3: 33.82
Median: 20.70
Q1: 14.57
Min: 7.12

DECK’s P/E Ratio of 15.56 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LEN

10.30

Household Durables Industry

Max: 33.67
Q3: 19.33
Median: 12.58
Q1: 9.62
Min: 6.48

LEN’s P/E Ratio of 10.30 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

DECK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DECK

3.01

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 4.35
Q3: 3.06
Median: 1.66
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.26

DECK’s P/S Ratio of 3.01 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LEN

0.95

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.54
Q3: 1.39
Median: 0.90
Q1: 0.54
Min: 0.19

LEN’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DECK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

6.24

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max: 9.74
Q3: 5.59
Median: 3.41
Q1: 2.01
Min: 0.56

DECK’s P/B Ratio of 6.24 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LEN

1.20

Household Durables Industry

Max: 3.26
Q3: 2.01
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.00
Min: 0.58

LEN’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Household Durables industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

DECK vs. LEN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	DECK	LEN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	15.56	10.30
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	3.01	0.95
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	6.24	1.20
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	14.22	15.02