Seek Returns logo

DECK vs. HAS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DECK and HAS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDECKHAS
Company NameDeckers Outdoor CorporationHasbro, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsLeisure Products
Market Capitalization15.80 billion USD11.26 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 15, 1993March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DECK and HAS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DECK vs. HAS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDECKHAS
5-Day Price Return4.50%3.84%
13-Week Price Return-15.55%22.51%
26-Week Price Return-38.16%34.65%
52-Week Price Return-30.43%27.31%
Month-to-Date Return0.29%6.87%
Year-to-Date Return-47.57%43.66%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.57M2.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.58M2.34M
3-Month Volatility59.09%26.93%
Beta1.100.63

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DECK

40.25%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Return on Equity of 40.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
35.76%
Q3
21.83%
Median
14.83%
Q1
5.19%
Min
-14.10%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

DECK vs. HAS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

19.31%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.31% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
13.45%
Q3
10.46%
Median
9.86%
Q1
4.71%
Min
-0.81%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

DECK vs. HAS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

23.64%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.64% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
15.65%
Q3
14.39%
Median
12.60%
Q1
8.85%
Min
2.80%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

DECK vs. HAS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDECKHAS
Return on Equity (TTM)40.25%-58.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)26.80%-9.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.31%-13.37%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.64%-8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.63%65.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

2.94

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

DECK’s Current Ratio of 2.94 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
3.37
Median
2.25
Q1
1.67
Min
1.12

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

DECK vs. HAS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.68
Q3
1.13
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

DECK vs. HAS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DECK

713.03

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 713.03, DECK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.53
Q3
28.24
Median
14.76
Q1
5.23
Min
-6.13

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DECK vs. HAS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDECKHAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.941.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.081.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.0013.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)713.035.34

Growth

Revenue Growth

DECK vs. HAS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DECK vs. HAS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

DECK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HAS

3.54%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.67%
Median
1.92%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.54%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

DECK vs. HAS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

DECK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
85.97%
Median
68.01%
Q1
48.42%
Min
0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

DECK vs. HAS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDECKHAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.54%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%63.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DECK

15.69

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

DECK’s P/E Ratio of 15.69 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HAS

--

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.62
Q3
29.98
Median
25.12
Q1
17.43
Min
10.66

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

DECK vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DECK

3.03

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

DECK’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HAS

2.60

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.93
Median
1.67
Q1
1.14
Min
0.43

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.60 aligns with the market consensus for the Leisure Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DECK vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

6.24

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

DECK’s P/B Ratio of 6.24 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max
7.37
Q3
4.91
Median
3.05
Q1
1.94
Min
1.37

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

DECK vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDECKHAS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.69--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.032.60
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.2442.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.3422.13