Seek Returns logo

DE vs. FLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DE and FLR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDEFLR
Company NameDeere & CompanyFluor Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization133.44 billion USD6.61 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972December 1, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DE and FLR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DE vs. FLR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDEFLR
5-Day Price Return2.90%-1.61%
13-Week Price Return-7.00%7.86%
26-Week Price Return5.68%-9.01%
52-Week Price Return32.13%-15.88%
Month-to-Date Return-6.04%-27.99%
Year-to-Date Return16.29%-17.11%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.82M4.41M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.24M3.95M
3-Month Volatility24.53%71.28%
Beta1.061.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DE

24.40%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

In the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, DE’s Return on Equity of 24.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FLR

105.11%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

DE vs. FLR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DE

12.40%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.40% places DE in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FLR

25.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

DE vs. FLR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DE

22.89%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.89% places DE in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FLR

1.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

DE vs. FLR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDEFLR
Return on Equity (TTM)24.40%105.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.32%45.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.40%25.35%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.89%1.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)40.60%3.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DE

0.94

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

DE’s Current Ratio of 0.94 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FLR

1.62

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

DE vs. FLR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DE

2.73

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.73, DE operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

FLR

0.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

DE vs. FLR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DE

3.69

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, DE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.69 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FLR

--

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.

DE vs. FLR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDEFLR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.941.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.721.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.730.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.69--

Growth

Revenue Growth

DE vs. FLR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DE vs. FLR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DE

1.24%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

DE’s Dividend Yield of 1.24% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

DE vs. FLR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DE

29.23%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

DE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.23% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLR

10.51%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

FLR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.51% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

DE vs. FLR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDEFLR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.24%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.23%10.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DE

23.50

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

DE’s P/E Ratio of 23.50 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLR

1.59

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.59 is below the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

DE vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DE

2.92

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

DE’s P/S Ratio of 2.92 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FLR

0.40

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.40 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

DE vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DE

5.14

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

DE’s P/B Ratio of 5.14 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FLR

1.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

DE vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDEFLR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.501.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.920.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.141.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.246.96