Seek Returns logo

DDOG vs. GLW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DDOG and GLW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDDOGGLW
Company NameDatadog, Inc.Corning Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization49.36 billion USD71.20 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateSeptember 19, 2019December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DDOG and GLW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DDOG vs. GLW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDDOGGLW
5-Day Price Return4.27%2.65%
13-Week Price Return6.01%55.98%
26-Week Price Return31.89%74.16%
52-Week Price Return24.69%82.82%
Month-to-Date Return4.19%22.38%
Year-to-Date Return-0.34%72.62%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.16M8.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.23M6.20M
3-Month Volatility47.39%31.18%
Beta1.201.15

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DDOG

4.35%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

DDOG’s Return on Equity of 4.35% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GLW

7.51%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

GLW’s Return on Equity of 7.51% is on par with the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

DDOG vs. GLW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DDOG

4.13%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

DDOG’s Net Profit Margin of 4.13% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GLW

5.77%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

GLW’s Net Profit Margin of 5.77% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

DDOG vs. GLW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DDOG

-0.61%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

DDOG has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.61%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GLW

12.06%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

GLW’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.06% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

DDOG vs. GLW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDDOGGLW
Return on Equity (TTM)4.35%7.51%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.24%2.92%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.13%5.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.61%12.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.92%34.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DDOG

3.43

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

DDOG’s Current Ratio of 3.43 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GLW

1.50

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

GLW’s Current Ratio of 1.50 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

DDOG vs. GLW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DDOG

0.31

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

DDOG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GLW

0.67

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

GLW’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

DDOG vs. GLW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DDOG

-1.64

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

DDOG has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.64. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GLW

5.09

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

GLW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.09 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DDOG vs. GLW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDDOGGLW
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.431.50
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.380.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.310.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-1.645.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

DDOG vs. GLW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DDOG vs. GLW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DDOG

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DDOG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GLW

1.41%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

GLW’s Dividend Yield of 1.41% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

DDOG vs. GLW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DDOG

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DDOG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GLW

80.34%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

GLW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 80.34% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

DDOG vs. GLW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDDOGGLW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.41%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%80.34%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DDOG

429.90

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

At 429.90, DDOG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Software industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GLW

86.07

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

At 86.07, GLW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

DDOG vs. GLW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DDOG

17.76

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

DDOG’s P/S Ratio of 17.76 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GLW

4.96

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

GLW’s P/S Ratio of 4.96 is in the upper echelon for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

DDOG vs. GLW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DDOG

14.52

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

DDOG’s P/B Ratio of 14.52 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GLW

4.05

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

GLW’s P/B Ratio of 4.05 is in the upper tier for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

DDOG vs. GLW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDDOGGLW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)429.9086.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)17.764.96
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)14.524.05
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)62.6956.35