Seek Returns logo

DAN vs. MGA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DAN and MGA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDANMGA
Company NameDana IncorporatedMagna International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization2.69 billion USD13.04 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 2008October 5, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DAN and MGA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DAN vs. MGA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDANMGA
5-Day Price Return9.56%4.39%
13-Week Price Return18.97%30.10%
26-Week Price Return30.55%16.88%
52-Week Price Return85.11%11.19%
Month-to-Date Return28.83%12.95%
Year-to-Date Return77.42%6.82%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.79M0.84M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.12M1.49M
3-Month Volatility35.53%27.40%
Beta2.131.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DAN

-1.78%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

DAN has a negative Return on Equity of -1.78%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

DAN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DAN

-0.26%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

DAN has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.26%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

DAN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DAN

0.84%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

DAN’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.84% is in the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

DAN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDANMGA
Return on Equity (TTM)-1.78%10.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.31%3.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.26%2.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)0.84%4.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)6.96%13.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DAN

1.36

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

DAN’s Current Ratio of 1.36 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

DAN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DAN

2.59

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.59, DAN operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Automobile Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

DAN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DAN

1.51

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, DAN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.51 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DAN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDANMGA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.361.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.000.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.590.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.518.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

DAN vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DAN vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DAN

2.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

DAN’s Dividend Yield of 2.35% is consistent with its peers in the Automobile Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MGA

4.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.35%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

DAN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DAN

76.79%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

DAN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 76.79% is in the upper quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

DAN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDANMGA
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.35%4.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)76.79%44.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DAN

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

P/E Ratio data for DAN is currently unavailable.

MGA

10.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 10.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

DAN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DAN

0.27

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, DAN’s P/S Ratio of 0.27 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MGA

0.30

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.30 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

DAN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DAN

2.08

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

DAN’s P/B Ratio of 2.08 is in the upper tier for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

DAN vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDANMGA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--10.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.270.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.080.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.236.83