Seek Returns logo

DAL vs. FLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DAL and FLR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDALFLR
Company NameDelta Air Lines, Inc.Fluor Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryPassenger AirlinesConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization38.80 billion USD6.89 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 3, 2007December 1, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DAL and FLR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DAL vs. FLR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDALFLR
5-Day Price Return10.80%-3.35%
13-Week Price Return16.19%13.64%
26-Week Price Return-12.51%-12.60%
52-Week Price Return52.12%-11.37%
Month-to-Date Return11.67%-24.87%
Year-to-Date Return-1.79%-13.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.91M7.35M
3-Month Avg. Volume11.14M3.93M
3-Month Volatility45.84%71.66%
Beta1.551.51

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DAL

29.02%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
28.15%
Median
15.41%
Q1
8.29%
Min
-11.01%

In the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, DAL’s Return on Equity of 29.02% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FLR

105.11%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

FLR’s Return on Equity of 105.11% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

DAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DAL

7.24%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
17.65%
Q3
8.90%
Median
5.80%
Q1
2.02%
Min
-3.12%

DAL’s Net Profit Margin of 7.24% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLR

25.35%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

FLR’s Net Profit Margin of 25.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

DAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DAL

9.30%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.33%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-2.88%

DAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.30% is around the midpoint for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLR

1.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

FLR’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.84% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

DAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDALFLR
Return on Equity (TTM)29.02%105.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.85%45.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.24%25.35%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.30%1.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.92%3.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DAL

0.38

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.94
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

DAL’s Current Ratio of 0.38 falls into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FLR

1.62

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

FLR’s Current Ratio of 1.62 is in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

DAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DAL

0.86

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
9.80
Q3
4.82
Median
1.30
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, DAL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.86 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FLR

0.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

DAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DAL

5.37

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
16.29
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

DAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.37 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FLR

--

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

Interest Coverage Ratio data for FLR is currently unavailable.

DAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDALFLR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.381.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.251.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.860.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.37--

Growth

Revenue Growth

DAL vs. FLR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DAL vs. FLR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DAL

1.02%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DAL’s Dividend Yield of 1.02% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FLR

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

FLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

DAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DAL

8.67%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
71.59%
Q3
38.54%
Median
8.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DAL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.67% is within the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FLR

10.51%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

FLR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.51% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

DAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDALFLR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.02%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)8.67%10.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DAL

8.52

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.29
Q3
11.94
Median
8.78
Q1
7.42
Min
3.07

DAL’s P/E Ratio of 8.52 is within the middle range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FLR

1.68

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

FLR’s P/E Ratio of 1.68 is below the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

DAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DAL

0.62

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.74
Median
0.61
Q1
0.44
Min
0.09

DAL’s P/S Ratio of 0.62 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FLR

0.43

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FLR’s P/S Ratio of 0.43 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

DAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DAL

1.84

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
2.89
Median
1.84
Q1
1.22
Min
0.56

DAL’s P/B Ratio of 1.84 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FLR

1.42

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

FLR’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

DAL vs. FLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Passenger Airlines and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDALFLR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.521.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.620.43
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.841.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.017.36