Seek Returns logo

CYTK vs. GH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CYTK and GH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCYTKGH
Company NameCytokinetics, IncorporatedGuardant Health, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryBiotechnologyHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization4.41 billion USD7.30 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateApril 30, 2004October 4, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CYTK and GH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CYTK vs. GH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCYTKGH
5-Day Price Return4.62%16.23%
13-Week Price Return14.78%40.59%
26-Week Price Return-20.12%27.08%
52-Week Price Return-34.35%92.22%
Month-to-Date Return-2.02%42.92%
Year-to-Date Return-21.60%91.72%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.62M4.09M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.79M2.42M
3-Month Volatility42.87%54.49%
Beta0.551.57

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CYTK

-132.03%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
77.14%
Q3
10.76%
Median
-20.08%
Q1
-42.71%
Min
-119.20%

CYTK has a negative Return on Equity of -132.03%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GH

-246.60%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

GH has a negative Return on Equity of -246.60%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CYTK vs. GH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CYTK

-3,201.47%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
59.44%
Q3
16.21%
Median
-11.49%
Q1
-167.42%
Min
-409.07%

CYTK has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3,201.47%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GH

-49.93%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

GH has a negative Net Profit Margin of -49.93%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CYTK vs. GH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CYTK

-2,943.30%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.62%
Q3
20.76%
Median
-12.41%
Q1
-181.14%
Min
-482.02%

CYTK has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2,943.30%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GH

-54.54%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

GH has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -54.54%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CYTK vs. GH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCYTKGH
Return on Equity (TTM)-132.03%-246.60%
Return on Assets (TTM)-43.75%-29.04%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-3,201.47%-49.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2,943.30%-54.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--62.84%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CYTK

5.99

Biotechnology Industry

Max
19.31
Q3
9.38
Median
4.54
Q1
2.45
Min
0.76

CYTK’s Current Ratio of 5.99 aligns with the median group of the Biotechnology industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GH

3.71

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

GH’s Current Ratio of 3.71 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CYTK vs. GH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CYTK

6.03

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.64
Median
0.09
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 6.03, CYTK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Biotechnology industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GH

16.78

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 16.78, GH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Health Care Providers & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CYTK vs. GH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CYTK

-16.50

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.91
Median
-7.81
Q1
-63.90
Min
-153.80

CYTK has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -16.50. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GH

-150.95

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

GH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -150.95. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CYTK vs. GH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCYTKGH
Current Ratio (MRQ)5.993.71
Quick Ratio (MRQ)5.893.19
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)6.0316.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-16.50-150.95

Growth

Revenue Growth

CYTK vs. GH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CYTK vs. GH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CYTK

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CYTK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CYTK vs. GH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CYTK

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CYTK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CYTK vs. GH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCYTKGH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CYTK

--

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.14
Q3
38.17
Median
29.01
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for CYTK is currently unavailable.

GH

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for GH is currently unavailable.

CYTK vs. GH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CYTK

228.72

Biotechnology Industry

Max
76.98
Q3
36.53
Median
9.49
Q1
4.49
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 228.72, CYTK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Biotechnology industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GH

8.75

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 8.75, GH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CYTK vs. GH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CYTK

58.48

Biotechnology Industry

Max
20.53
Q3
9.76
Median
4.77
Q1
2.49
Min
0.59

At 58.48, CYTK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Biotechnology industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GH

35.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

At 35.72, GH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CYTK vs. GH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCYTKGH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)228.728.75
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)58.4835.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)76.62--