Seek Returns logo

CYBR vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CYBR and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCYBRJBL
Company NameCyberArk Software Ltd.Jabil Inc.
CountryIsraelUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization24.75 billion USD21.69 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateSeptember 24, 2014May 3, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CYBR and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CYBR vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCYBRJBL
5-Day Price Return1.36%-5.79%
13-Week Price Return22.98%-10.59%
26-Week Price Return45.09%48.51%
52-Week Price Return78.74%69.86%
Month-to-Date Return1.50%-6.95%
Year-to-Date Return47.20%40.43%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.53M1.96M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.18M1.55M
3-Month Volatility37.77%35.21%
Beta0.971.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CYBR

-7.93%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

CYBR has a negative Return on Equity of -7.93%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

JBL

45.71%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 45.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CYBR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CYBR

-13.78%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

CYBR has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.78%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

JBL

2.20%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.20% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CYBR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CYBR

-8.25%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

CYBR has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.25%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

JBL

3.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.97% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CYBR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCYBRJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)-7.93%45.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)-4.84%3.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-13.78%2.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-8.25%3.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)76.86%8.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CYBR

2.31

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

CYBR’s Current Ratio of 2.31 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JBL

1.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

JBL’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CYBR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CYBR

0.53

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CYBR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JBL

1.91

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.91, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CYBR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CYBR

-6.02

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

CYBR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.02. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

JBL

4.08

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CYBR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCYBRJBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.311.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.210.51
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.531.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-6.024.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

CYBR vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CYBR vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CYBR

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CYBR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL

0.16%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CYBR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CYBR

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CYBR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL

5.48%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.48% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CYBR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCYBRJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%5.48%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CYBR

--

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

P/E Ratio data for CYBR is currently unavailable.

JBL

33.38

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 33.38 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CYBR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CYBR

20.82

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

CYBR’s P/S Ratio of 20.82 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

JBL

0.74

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.74 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CYBR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CYBR

8.83

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

CYBR’s P/B Ratio of 8.83 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JBL

14.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

At 14.53, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CYBR vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCYBRJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--33.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)20.820.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.8314.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)100.1118.71