Seek Returns logo

CWK vs. JLL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CWK and JLL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCWKJLL
Company NameCushman & Wakefield plcJones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryReal Estate Management & DevelopmentReal Estate Management & Development
Market Capitalization3.47 billion USD14.07 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 2, 2018July 17, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CWK and JLL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CWK vs. JLL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCWKJLL
5-Day Price Return11.87%8.24%
13-Week Price Return36.18%23.45%
26-Week Price Return12.63%5.07%
52-Week Price Return23.29%26.38%
Month-to-Date Return22.89%9.82%
Year-to-Date Return14.53%17.29%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.03M0.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.32M0.44M
3-Month Volatility42.92%30.36%
Beta1.541.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CWK

11.53%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
8.92%
Median
3.63%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-8.05%

In the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CWK’s Return on Equity of 11.53% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

JLL

8.26%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
8.92%
Median
3.63%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-8.05%

JLL’s Return on Equity of 8.26% is on par with the norm for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CWK vs. JLL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CWK

2.11%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
57.16%
Q3
24.60%
Median
9.48%
Q1
2.61%
Min
-26.61%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CWK’s Net Profit Margin of 2.11% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

JLL

2.29%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
57.16%
Q3
24.60%
Median
9.48%
Q1
2.61%
Min
-26.61%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, JLL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.29% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CWK vs. JLL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CWK

4.29%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
92.29%
Q3
43.61%
Median
20.96%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-48.90%

CWK’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.29% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

JLL

3.72%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
92.29%
Q3
43.61%
Median
20.96%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-48.90%

JLL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.72% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CWK vs. JLL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCWKJLL
Return on Equity (TTM)11.53%8.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.74%3.29%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.11%2.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.29%3.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)18.60%57.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CWK

1.13

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.22
Median
1.42
Q1
1.03
Min
0.04

CWK’s Current Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the median group of the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JLL

1.10

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.22
Median
1.42
Q1
1.03
Min
0.04

JLL’s Current Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the median group of the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CWK vs. JLL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CWK

1.57

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.30
Median
0.84
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

CWK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Real Estate Management & Development industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.57. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

JLL

0.45

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.30
Median
0.84
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

JLL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CWK vs. JLL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CWK

1.92

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
23.14
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.29
Min
-4.45

CWK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JLL

4.25

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
23.14
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.29
Min
-4.45

JLL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.25 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CWK vs. JLL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCWKJLL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.131.10
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.071.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.570.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.924.25

Growth

Revenue Growth

CWK vs. JLL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CWK vs. JLL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CWK

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.51%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

CWK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JLL

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.51%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

JLL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CWK vs. JLL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CWK

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
242.45%
Q3
106.13%
Median
55.27%
Q1
14.97%
Min
0.00%

CWK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JLL

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
242.45%
Q3
106.13%
Median
55.27%
Q1
14.97%
Min
0.00%

JLL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CWK vs. JLL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCWKJLL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CWK

16.56

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
41.09
Q3
23.50
Median
17.29
Q1
11.14
Min
6.36

CWK’s P/E Ratio of 16.56 is within the middle range for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JLL

24.33

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
41.09
Q3
23.50
Median
17.29
Q1
11.14
Min
6.36

A P/E Ratio of 24.33 places JLL in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CWK vs. JLL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CWK

0.35

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.22
Q3
5.64
Median
2.53
Q1
0.98
Min
0.01

In the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CWK’s P/S Ratio of 0.35 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

JLL

0.56

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.22
Q3
5.64
Median
2.53
Q1
0.98
Min
0.01

In the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, JLL’s P/S Ratio of 0.56 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CWK vs. JLL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CWK

1.35

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.18
Median
0.75
Q1
0.35
Min
0.06

CWK’s P/B Ratio of 1.35 is in the upper tier for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

JLL

1.72

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.18
Median
0.75
Q1
0.35
Min
0.06

JLL’s P/B Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper tier for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CWK vs. JLL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCWKJLL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.5624.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.350.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.351.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.649.99