Seek Returns logo

CW vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CW and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCWMMM
Company NameCurtiss-Wright Corporation3M Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization18.72 billion USD85.33 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CW and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CW vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCWMMM
5-Day Price Return4.93%5.58%
13-Week Price Return28.25%6.57%
26-Week Price Return41.82%5.17%
52-Week Price Return66.34%29.86%
Month-to-Date Return1.34%7.36%
Year-to-Date Return39.99%24.10%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.46M3.24M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.33M3.62M
3-Month Volatility26.81%25.27%
Beta1.141.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CW

17.68%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

CW’s Return on Equity of 17.68% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CW

13.66%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.66% places CW in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CW

17.71%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

CW’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCWMMM
Return on Equity (TTM)17.68%91.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.02%9.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.66%16.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.71%19.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)37.34%41.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CW

1.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

CW’s Current Ratio of 1.95 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CW

0.35

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, CW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.35 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CW

12.64

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

CW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCWMMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.951.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.351.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.353.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.64-15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

CW vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CW vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CW

0.17%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CW’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM

1.83%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.83% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CW

9.64%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.64% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCWMMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%1.83%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)9.64%39.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CW

40.76

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

CW’s P/E Ratio of 40.76 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM

21.41

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 21.41 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CW

5.57

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

CW’s P/S Ratio of 5.57 is in the upper echelon for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MMM

3.43

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.43 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CW

6.79

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

CW’s P/B Ratio of 6.79 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CW vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCWMMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.7621.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.573.43
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.7918.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)34.0131.57