CW vs. LII: Curtiss-Wright vs. Lennox Stock Comparison
How do Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Lennox (LII) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Lennox (LII) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CW is classified in Aerospace & Defense while LII is classified in Building Products.
| Profile Item | CW | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | Lennox International Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Building Products |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Building Products |
| Market Capitalization | 16.81 billion USD | 11.70 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | July 29, 1999 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CW | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -15.83% | -27.83% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.49% | -2.32% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 29.54% | 3.79% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CW | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.26% | 41.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.18 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.25% | -49.95% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 427.49K | 563.34K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CW | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.53 | -0.77 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.71 | -0.96 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Lennox (LII) at 62.82% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.82% also sits in the top quartile.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
21.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CW
- 21.82%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
LII
Capital Goods industry group
62.82%
- LII
- 62.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 14.86% and Lennox (LII) at 13.76% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
14.86%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CW
- 14.86%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
LII
Capital Goods industry group
13.76%
- Max
- 27.47%
- LII
- 13.76%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 19.87% and Lennox (LII) at 20.57% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
19.87%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CW
- 19.87%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
LII
Capital Goods industry group
20.57%
- Max
- 36.60%
- LII
- 20.57%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CW | LII |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 21.82% | 62.82% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.90% | 15.93% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 14.86% | 13.76% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.87% | 20.57% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 38.07% | 32.62% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 12.08% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Lennox (LII) at -2.73% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.99% and Lennox (LII) at 1.11% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CW | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 12.08% | -2.73% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 11.01% | 3.26% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 21.99% | 1.11% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.09% | 17.97% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 1.42 and Lennox (LII) at 1.21 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CW
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
LII
Capital Goods industry group
1.21
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LII
- 1.21
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.45 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Lennox (LII) at 1.58 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.45
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CW
- 0.45
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
LII
Capital Goods industry group
1.58
- Max
- 2.33
- LII
- 1.58
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CW | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 1.21 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.45 | 1.58 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.00 | 1.73 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Lennox (LII) at 1.53% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.23% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, LII the richer one.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.23%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- CW
- 0.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LII
Capital Goods industry group
1.53%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LII
- 1.53%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.67% and Lennox (LII) at 24.68% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- CW
- 6.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LII
Capital Goods industry group
24.68%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- LII
- 24.68%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CW | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.23% | 1.53% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 6.67% | 24.68% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Lennox (LII) at 15.47 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 30.92 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for LII, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
30.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- CW
- 30.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
LII
Capital Goods industry group
15.47
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- LII
- 15.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Lennox (LII) at 2.15 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 4.50 sits in the pricier quartile — CW costs more per dollar of sales.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
4.50
- Max
- 7.54
- CW
- 4.50
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
LII
Capital Goods industry group
2.15
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LII
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.64 and Lennox (LII) at 8.88 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.64
- Max
- 9.66
- CW
- 6.64
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
LII
Capital Goods industry group
8.88
- Max
- 9.66
- LII
- 8.88
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CW | LII |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 30.92 | 15.47 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.50 | 2.15 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.64 | 8.88 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | 3.14% |