Seek Returns logo

CW vs. LII: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CW and LII, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCWLII
Company NameCurtiss-Wright CorporationLennox International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseBuilding Products
Market Capitalization18.72 billion USD21.49 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980July 29, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CW and LII by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CW vs. LII: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCWLII
5-Day Price Return4.93%3.00%
13-Week Price Return28.25%2.68%
26-Week Price Return41.82%4.49%
52-Week Price Return66.34%9.39%
Month-to-Date Return1.34%0.44%
Year-to-Date Return39.99%0.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.46M0.31M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.33M0.40M
3-Month Volatility26.81%30.16%
Beta1.141.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CW

17.68%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

CW’s Return on Equity of 17.68% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LII

99.44%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

LII’s Return on Equity of 99.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Building Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CW vs. LII: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CW

13.66%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.66% places CW in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LII

15.41%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.41% places LII in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CW vs. LII: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CW

17.71%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

CW’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

LII

19.52%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.52% places LII in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CW vs. LII: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCWLII
Return on Equity (TTM)17.68%99.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.02%24.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.66%15.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.71%19.52%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)37.34%33.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CW

1.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

CW’s Current Ratio of 1.95 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LII

1.41

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

LII’s Current Ratio of 1.41 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CW vs. LII: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CW

0.35

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, CW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.35 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LII

1.31

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

LII’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.31. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CW vs. LII: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CW

12.64

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

CW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LII

26.81

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

LII’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.81 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CW vs. LII: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCWLII
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.951.41
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.350.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.351.31
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.6426.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

CW vs. LII: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CW vs. LII: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CW

0.17%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CW’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LII

0.77%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

LII’s Dividend Yield of 0.77% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CW vs. LII: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CW

9.64%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.64% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LII

19.61%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

LII’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.61% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CW vs. LII: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCWLII
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%0.77%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)9.64%19.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CW

40.76

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

CW’s P/E Ratio of 40.76 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LII

25.54

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

LII’s P/E Ratio of 25.54 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CW vs. LII: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CW

5.57

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

CW’s P/S Ratio of 5.57 is in the upper echelon for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LII

3.94

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

LII’s P/S Ratio of 3.94 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CW vs. LII: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CW

6.79

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

CW’s P/B Ratio of 6.79 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LII

22.59

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

At 22.59, LII’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CW vs. LII: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCWLII
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.7625.54
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.573.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.7922.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)34.0128.75