Seek Returns logo

CW vs. GGG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CW and GGG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCWGGG
Company NameCurtiss-Wright CorporationGraco Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseMachinery
Market Capitalization20.95 billion USD13.28 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CW and GGG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CW vs. GGG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCWGGG
5-Day Price Return-6.26%-1.99%
13-Week Price Return13.17%-5.04%
26-Week Price Return39.58%-6.52%
52-Week Price Return43.11%-9.45%
Month-to-Date Return-7.41%-1.98%
Year-to-Date Return55.43%-4.91%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.30M0.85M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.28M0.76M
3-Month Volatility29.47%16.50%
Beta0.961.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CW

18.15%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
23.64%
Median
12.98%
Q1
8.07%
Min
-2.55%

CW’s Return on Equity of 18.15% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GGG

19.59%

Machinery Industry

Max
30.85%
Q3
19.99%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.44%
Min
-7.69%

GGG’s Return on Equity of 19.59% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CW vs. GGG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CW

13.78%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.96%
Q3
9.50%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.45%
Min
1.01%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.78% places CW in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GGG

22.72%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.28%
Q3
10.99%
Median
7.89%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-1.46%

GGG’s Net Profit Margin of 22.72% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CW vs. GGG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CW

17.97%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
17.97%
Q3
12.09%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.41%
Min
-1.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.97% places CW in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GGG

27.20%

Machinery Industry

Max
27.20%
Q3
15.91%
Median
11.33%
Q1
7.73%
Min
0.23%

An Operating Profit Margin of 27.20% places GGG in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CW vs. GGG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCWGGG
Return on Equity (TTM)18.15%19.59%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.19%16.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.78%22.72%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.97%27.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)37.43%52.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CW

1.75

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.01
Median
1.22
Q1
1.07
Min
0.68

CW’s Current Ratio of 1.75 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GGG

3.18

Machinery Industry

Max
3.27
Q3
2.16
Median
1.75
Q1
1.32
Min
0.70

GGG’s Current Ratio of 3.18 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CW vs. GGG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CW

0.38

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.99
Median
0.63
Q1
0.39
Min
0.03

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, CW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GGG

0.01

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.45
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, GGG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.01 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CW vs. GGG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CW

12.64

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
29.86
Q3
19.49
Median
7.09
Q1
2.62
Min
-7.63

CW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GGG

209.37

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
36.46
Median
13.55
Q1
7.73
Min
-1.43

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 209.37, GGG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Machinery industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CW vs. GGG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCWGGG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.753.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.172.27
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.380.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.64209.37

Growth

Revenue Growth

CW vs. GGG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CW vs. GGG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CW

0.16%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.87%
Q3
1.46%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.10%
Min
0.00%

CW’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GGG

1.37%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.98%
Q3
2.83%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.17%
Min
0.00%

GGG’s Dividend Yield of 1.37% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CW vs. GGG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CW

9.12%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
51.46%
Median
20.20%
Q1
4.21%
Min
0.00%

CW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.12% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GGG

36.31%

Machinery Industry

Max
209.29%
Q3
102.41%
Median
62.34%
Q1
29.36%
Min
0.00%

GGG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.31% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CW vs. GGG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCWGGG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.16%1.37%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)9.12%36.31%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CW

44.11

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
94.22
Q3
53.31
Median
32.27
Q1
24.64
Min
14.57

CW’s P/E Ratio of 44.11 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GGG

26.53

Machinery Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
29.52
Median
24.18
Q1
16.92
Min
7.99

GGG’s P/E Ratio of 26.53 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CW vs. GGG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CW

6.08

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
7.20
Q3
3.95
Median
2.35
Q1
1.71
Min
0.32

CW’s P/S Ratio of 6.08 is in the upper echelon for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GGG

6.03

Machinery Industry

Max
5.25
Q3
2.82
Median
1.74
Q1
0.99
Min
0.27

With a P/S Ratio of 6.03, GGG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Machinery industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CW vs. GGG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CW

8.09

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
18.61
Q3
9.58
Median
5.45
Q1
3.11
Min
0.94

CW’s P/B Ratio of 8.09 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GGG

5.38

Machinery Industry

Max
7.18
Q3
4.18
Median
2.71
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

GGG’s P/B Ratio of 5.38 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CW vs. GGG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCWGGG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)44.1126.53
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.086.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.095.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.7721.15