CW vs. GGG: Curtiss-Wright vs. Graco Stock Comparison
How do Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Graco (GGG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Graco (GGG) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CW is classified in Aerospace & Defense while GGG is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | CW | GGG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | Graco Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 16.81 billion USD | 10.88 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CW | GGG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -15.83% | -12.76% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.49% | -1.59% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 29.54% | -1.14% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CW | GGG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.26% | 26.08% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 0.87 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.25% | -29.55% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 427.49K | 1.99M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CW | GGG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.53 | -0.65 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.71 | -0.80 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.82% and Graco (GGG) at 20.38% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
21.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CW
- 21.82%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
20.38%
- Max
- 40.55%
- GGG
- 20.38%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 14.86% and Graco (GGG) at 22.40% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
14.86%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CW
- 14.86%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
22.40%
- Max
- 27.47%
- GGG
- 22.40%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 19.87% and Graco (GGG) at 25.26% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
19.87%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CW
- 19.87%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
25.26%
- Max
- 36.60%
- GGG
- 25.26%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CW | GGG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 21.82% | 20.38% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.90% | 12.02% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 14.86% | 22.40% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.87% | 25.26% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 38.07% | 51.96% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 12.08% and Graco (GGG) at 5.83% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.99% and Graco (GGG) at 9.22% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CW | GGG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 12.08% | 5.83% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 11.01% | 1.43% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 21.99% | 9.22% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.09% | 5.01% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Graco (GGG) at 2.13 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 1.42 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CW.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CW
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
2.13
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- GGG
- 2.13
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Graco (GGG) at 0.07 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.45 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.45
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CW
- 0.45
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
0.07
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- GGG
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CW | GGG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 2.13 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.45 | 0.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.00 | 0.03 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Graco (GGG) at 1.74% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.23% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, GGG the richer one.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.23%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- CW
- 0.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
1.74%
- Max
- 2.66%
- GGG
- 1.74%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.67% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Graco (GGG) at 37.42% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- CW
- 6.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
37.42%
- Max
- 67.39%
- GGG
- 37.42%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CW | GGG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.23% | 1.74% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 6.67% | 37.42% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 30.92 and Graco (GGG) at 21.89 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
30.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- CW
- 30.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
21.89
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- GGG
- 21.89
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 4.50 and Graco (GGG) at 4.71 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
4.50
- Max
- 7.54
- CW
- 4.50
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
4.71
- Max
- 7.54
- GGG
- 4.71
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Graco (GGG) at 4.41 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.64 carries an above-peer premium to book — CW is pricier on assets.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.64
- Max
- 9.66
- CW
- 6.64
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
GGG
Capital Goods industry group
4.41
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- GGG
- 4.41
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CW | GGG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 30.92 | 21.89 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.50 | 4.71 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.64 | 4.41 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | 3.94% |