Seek Returns logo

CW vs. GFL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CW and GFL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCWGFL
Company NameCurtiss-Wright CorporationGFL Environmental Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization20.43 billion USD16.67 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 3, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CW and GFL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CW vs. GFL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCWGFL
5-Day Price Return6.18%2.07%
13-Week Price Return11.13%-3.14%
26-Week Price Return64.56%-4.46%
52-Week Price Return66.72%22.26%
Month-to-Date Return13.55%-3.99%
Year-to-Date Return53.00%2.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.27M0.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.32M0.44M
3-Month Volatility27.83%22.17%
Beta1.130.48

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CW

17.68%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

CW’s Return on Equity of 17.68% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GFL

48.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

GFL’s Return on Equity of 48.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CW vs. GFL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CW

13.66%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.66% places CW in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFL

49.85%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

GFL’s Net Profit Margin of 49.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CW vs. GFL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CW

17.71%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.71% places CW in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GFL

5.83%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

GFL’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.83% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CW vs. GFL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCWGFL
Return on Equity (TTM)17.68%48.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.02%18.18%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.66%49.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.71%5.83%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)37.34%20.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CW

1.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

CW’s Current Ratio of 1.95 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GFL

0.67

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

GFL’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CW vs. GFL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CW

0.35

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, CW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.35 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GFL

0.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

GFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CW vs. GFL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CW

12.64

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

CW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GFL

-0.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

GFL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CW vs. GFL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCWGFL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.950.67
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.350.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.350.94
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.64-0.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

CW vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CW vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CW

0.16%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

CW’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GFL

0.13%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Yield of 0.13% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CW vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CW

9.12%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

CW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.12% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GFL

0.61%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.61% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CW vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCWGFL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.16%0.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)9.12%0.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CW

45.32

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

CW’s P/E Ratio of 45.32 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFL

6.64

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

In the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, GFL’s P/E Ratio of 6.64 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CW vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CW

6.19

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

CW’s P/S Ratio of 6.19 is in the upper echelon for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GFL

3.31

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

GFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.31 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CW vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CW

6.79

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

CW’s P/B Ratio of 6.79 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GFL

3.27

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

GFL’s P/B Ratio of 3.27 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CW vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCWGFL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)45.326.64
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.193.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.793.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.6772.36