CW vs. GD: Curtiss-Wright vs. General Dynamics Stock Comparison
How do Curtiss-Wright (CW) and General Dynamics (GD) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Curtiss-Wright (CW) and General Dynamics (GD) are both classified in the Aerospace & Defense sub-industry within the broader Aerospace & Defense industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | CW | GD |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | General Dynamics Corp. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 16.81 billion USD | 95.68 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CW | GD |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -15.83% | 6.52% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.49% | 16.95% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 29.54% | 14.65% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CW | GD |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.26% | 23.03% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 0.30 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.25% | -22.55% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 427.49K | 1.19M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CW | GD |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.53 | 0.10 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.71 | 0.15 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.82% sits in the top ROE quartile, while General Dynamics (GD) at 18.01% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CW.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
21.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CW
- 21.82%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
GD
Capital Goods industry group
18.01%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- GD
- 18.01%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 14.86% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of General Dynamics (GD) at 8.24%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
14.86%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CW
- 14.86%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
GD
Capital Goods industry group
8.24%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- GD
- 8.24%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 19.87% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of General Dynamics (GD) at 10.49%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
19.87%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CW
- 19.87%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
GD
Capital Goods industry group
10.49%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- GD
- 10.49%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CW | GD |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 21.82% | 18.01% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.90% | 6.23% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 14.86% | 8.24% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.87% | 10.49% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 38.07% | 15.42% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 12.08% and General Dynamics (GD) at 10.13% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.99% and General Dynamics (GD) at 13.35% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CW | GD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 12.08% | 10.13% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 11.01% | 10.07% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 21.99% | 13.35% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.09% | 8.22% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 1.42 and General Dynamics (GD) at 1.43 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CW
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
GD
Capital Goods industry group
1.43
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- GD
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.45 and General Dynamics (GD) at 0.33 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.45
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CW
- 0.45
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
GD
Capital Goods industry group
0.33
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- GD
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CW | GD |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 1.43 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.45 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.00 | 0.68 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
General Dynamics (GD) at 1.76% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.23% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, GD the richer one.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.23%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- CW
- 0.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GD
Capital Goods industry group
1.76%
- Max
- 2.66%
- GD
- 1.76%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.67% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while General Dynamics (GD) at 36.90% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- CW
- 6.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GD
Capital Goods industry group
36.90%
- Max
- 67.39%
- GD
- 36.90%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CW | GD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.23% | 1.76% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 6.67% | 36.90% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 30.92 and General Dynamics (GD) at 20.84 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
30.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- CW
- 30.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
GD
Capital Goods industry group
20.84
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- GD
- 20.84
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
General Dynamics (GD) at 1.69 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 4.50 sits in the pricier quartile — CW costs more per dollar of sales.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
4.50
- Max
- 7.54
- CW
- 4.50
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
GD
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- GD
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
General Dynamics (GD) at 3.50 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.64 carries an above-peer premium to book — CW is pricier on assets.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.64
- Max
- 9.66
- CW
- 6.64
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
GD
Capital Goods industry group
3.50
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- GD
- 3.50
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CW | GD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 30.92 | 20.84 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.50 | 1.69 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.64 | 3.50 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | 4.76% |