Seek Returns logo

CW vs. FER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CW and FER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCWFER
Company NameCurtiss-Wright CorporationFerrovial SE
CountryUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization20.27 billion USD42.88 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980August 13, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CW and FER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CW vs. FER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCWFER
5-Day Price Return1.38%3.94%
13-Week Price Return10.25%12.12%
26-Week Price Return69.57%21.76%
52-Week Price Return58.93%35.15%
Month-to-Date Return-0.91%2.79%
Year-to-Date Return51.61%23.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.23M0.86M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.31M0.64M
3-Month Volatility27.44%14.19%
Beta0.930.95

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CW

17.68%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

CW’s Return on Equity of 17.68% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FER

56.21%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

FER’s Return on Equity of 56.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CW vs. FER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CW

13.66%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.66% places CW in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FER

35.99%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

FER’s Net Profit Margin of 35.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CW vs. FER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CW

17.71%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.71% places CW in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FER

34.91%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

FER’s Operating Profit Margin of 34.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CW vs. FER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCWFER
Return on Equity (TTM)17.68%56.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.02%12.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.66%35.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.71%34.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)37.34%87.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CW

1.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

CW’s Current Ratio of 1.95 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FER

0.94

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

FER’s Current Ratio of 0.94 falls into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CW vs. FER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CW

0.35

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, CW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.35 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FER

1.95

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

FER’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction & Engineering industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CW vs. FER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CW

12.64

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

CW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FER

9.20

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

FER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CW vs. FER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCWFER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.950.94
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.350.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.351.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.649.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

CW vs. FER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CW vs. FER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CW

0.16%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

CW’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FER

0.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Yield of 0.34% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CW vs. FER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CW

9.12%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

CW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.12% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FER

3.63%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

FER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.63% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CW vs. FER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCWFER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.16%0.34%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)9.12%3.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CW

45.24

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

CW’s P/E Ratio of 45.24 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FER

10.70

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FER’s P/E Ratio of 10.70 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CW vs. FER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CW

6.18

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

CW’s P/S Ratio of 6.18 is in the upper echelon for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FER

3.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 3.85, FER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction & Engineering industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CW vs. FER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CW

6.79

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

CW’s P/B Ratio of 6.79 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FER

5.63

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

FER’s P/B Ratio of 5.63 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CW vs. FER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCWFER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)45.2410.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.183.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.795.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.6031.40