Seek Returns

CW vs. FER: Curtiss-Wright vs. Ferrovial Stock Comparison

How do Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Ferrovial (FER) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Ferrovial (FER) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CW is classified in Aerospace & Defense while FER is classified in Construction & Engineering.

Company profile comparison for Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Ferrovial (FER)
Profile ItemCWFER
NameCurtiss-Wright CorporationFerrovial N.V.
Country/RegionUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCapital GoodsCapital Goods
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseConstruction & Engineering
GICS Sub-IndustryAerospace & DefenseConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization16.81 billion USD42.19 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980August 13, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CW
FER
GSPC
Loading price history…
Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs. Ferrovial (FER), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Ferrovial (FER). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Ferrovial (FER). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Ferrovial (FER)
MetricCWFER
Total Return (1Y)-15.83%-1.10%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)33.49%26.01%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)29.54%17.20%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CW
FER
GSPC
Loading price history…
Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs. Ferrovial (FER), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Ferrovial (FER). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Ferrovial (FER)
MetricCWFER
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)38.26%27.38%
Beta (5Y)0.930.36
Max Drawdown (5Y)-45.25%-33.67%
Avg. Volume (3M)427.49K1.95M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CW and FER are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Ferrovial (FER)
MetricCWFER
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.53-0.20
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.71-0.30

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.82% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 11.62% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CW.

CW

Capital Goods industry group

21.82%

Max
40.55%
CW
21.82%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%

FER

Capital Goods industry group

11.62%

Max
40.55%
Q3
19.29%
Median
12.12%
FER
11.62%
Q1
4.08%
Min
-17.12%
Loading chart…
Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs. Ferrovial (FER): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 14.86% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Ferrovial (FER) at 6.15%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

CW

Capital Goods industry group

14.86%

Max
27.47%
CW
14.86%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.15%

Max
27.47%
Q3
12.10%
Median
6.30%
FER
6.15%
Q1
1.40%
Min
-12.89%
Loading chart…
Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs. Ferrovial (FER): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 19.87% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Ferrovial (FER) at 10.45%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

CW

Capital Goods industry group

19.87%

Max
36.60%
CW
19.87%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%

FER

Capital Goods industry group

10.45%

Max
36.60%
Q3
18.33%
Median
11.12%
FER
10.45%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-12.63%
Loading chart…
Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs. Ferrovial (FER): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Ferrovial (FER)
MetricCWFER
ROE (TTM)21.82%11.62%
ROA (TTM)8.90%2.62%
Net Margin (TTM)14.86%6.15%
Operating Margin (TTM)19.87%10.45%
Gross Margin (TTM)38.07%87.14%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 12.08% and Ferrovial (FER) at 5.24% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs. Ferrovial (FER): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.99% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ferrovial (FER) at -72.26% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs. Ferrovial (FER): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Ferrovial (FER)
MetricCWFER
Revenue Growth (YoY)12.08%5.24%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)11.01%8.43%
EPS Growth (YoY)21.99%-72.26%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)19.09%70.54%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 1.42 and Ferrovial (FER) at 1.20 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

CW

Capital Goods industry group

1.42

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
CW
1.42
Min
0.36

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.20

Max
5.22
Q3
2.95
Median
2.08
Q1
1.43
FER
1.20
Min
0.36
Loading chart…
Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs. Ferrovial (FER): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.45 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.44 uses more debt funding than most peers.

CW

Capital Goods industry group

0.45

Max
2.33
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
CW
0.45
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

FER

Capital Goods industry group

1.44

Max
2.33
FER
1.44
Q3
1.12
Median
0.60
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs. Ferrovial (FER): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Ferrovial (FER)
MetricCWFER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.421.20
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.451.44
Net Debt / EBITDA1.004.39

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.23% and Ferrovial (FER) at 0.94% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CW

Capital Goods industry group

0.23%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
Median
0.24%
CW
0.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FER

Capital Goods industry group

0.94%

Max
2.66%
Q3
1.14%
FER
0.94%
Median
0.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs. Ferrovial (FER): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.67% keeps its payout in the industry’s typical band, while Ferrovial (FER) at 71.24% pays out more than any of its peers — the most stretched cover in its group.

CW

Capital Goods industry group

6.67%

Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
CW
6.67%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FER

Capital Goods industry group

71.24%

FER
71.24%
Max
67.39%
Q3
28.02%
Median
6.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs. Ferrovial (FER): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Ferrovial (FER)
MetricCWFER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.23%0.94%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.67%71.24%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 30.92 and Ferrovial (FER) at 32.26 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

CW

Capital Goods industry group

30.92

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
CW
30.92
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03

FER

Capital Goods industry group

32.26

Max
59.38
Q3
35.92
FER
32.26
Median
25.41
Q1
19.47
Min
3.03
Loading chart…
Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs. Ferrovial (FER): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 4.50 and Ferrovial (FER) at 4.28 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

CW

Capital Goods industry group

4.50

Max
7.54
CW
4.50
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03

FER

Capital Goods industry group

4.28

Max
7.54
FER
4.28
Q3
3.76
Median
2.15
Q1
1.03
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs. Ferrovial (FER): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.64 and Ferrovial (FER) at 6.59 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

CW

Capital Goods industry group

6.64

Max
9.66
CW
6.64
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08

FER

Capital Goods industry group

6.59

Max
9.66
FER
6.59
Q3
5.00
Median
3.12
Q1
1.81
Min
-1.08
Loading chart…
Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs. Ferrovial (FER): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Ferrovial (FER)
MetricCWFER
P/E Ratio (TTM)30.9232.26
P/S Ratio (TTM)4.504.28
P/B Ratio (MRQ)6.646.59
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)2.86%2.11%