Seek Returns logo

CVS vs. TEM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CVS and TEM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCVSTEM
Company NameCVS Health CorporationTempus AI, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization98.43 billion USD12.77 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973June 14, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CVS and TEM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CVS vs. TEM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCVSTEM
5-Day Price Return-0.69%-15.04%
13-Week Price Return19.51%18.02%
26-Week Price Return16.11%22.16%
52-Week Price Return35.87%26.40%
Month-to-Date Return-0.78%-20.11%
Year-to-Date Return72.73%112.62%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.69M7.31M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.64M9.04M
3-Month Volatility22.60%69.31%
Beta0.482.51

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CVS

0.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

CVS’s Return on Equity of 0.62% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TEM

-107.12%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.51%
Median
6.47%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

TEM has a negative Return on Equity of -107.12%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CVS vs. TEM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CVS

0.12%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, CVS’s Net Profit Margin of 0.12% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TEM

-20.98%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
32.18%
Q3
18.30%
Median
10.19%
Q1
4.20%
Min
-2.05%

TEM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -20.98%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CVS vs. TEM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CVS

1.49%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

CVS’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.49% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TEM

-24.66%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
38.39%
Q3
21.40%
Median
13.57%
Q1
8.38%
Min
-3.51%

TEM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -24.66%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CVS vs. TEM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCVSTEM
Return on Equity (TTM)0.62%-107.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.18%-15.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.12%-20.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.49%-24.66%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)13.88%60.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CVS

0.83

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

CVS’s Current Ratio of 0.83 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TEM

1.54

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
3.46
Q3
2.78
Median
1.91
Q1
1.53
Min
0.43

TEM’s Current Ratio of 1.54 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CVS vs. TEM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CVS

0.90

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

CVS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.90 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TEM

2.58

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.58, TEM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CVS vs. TEM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CVS

3.08

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

CVS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TEM

-14.08

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

TEM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -14.08. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CVS vs. TEM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCVSTEM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.831.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.631.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.902.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.08-14.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

CVS vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CVS vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CVS

3.38%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.38%, CVS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.41%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CVS vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CVS

74.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CVS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 74.62% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
113.14%
Q3
61.34%
Median
17.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CVS vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCVSTEM
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.38%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)74.62%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CVS

213.80

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

At 213.80, CVS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TEM

--

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
75.35
Q3
51.00
Median
32.93
Q1
25.27
Min
1.43

P/E Ratio data for TEM is currently unavailable.

CVS vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CVS

0.25

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, CVS’s P/S Ratio of 0.25 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TEM

13.41

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.49
Q3
6.43
Median
4.66
Q1
2.88
Min
1.08

With a P/S Ratio of 13.41, TEM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CVS vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CVS

1.31

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

CVS’s P/B Ratio of 1.31 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TEM

35.53

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
6.69
Q3
5.00
Median
3.46
Q1
2.38
Min
0.93

At 35.53, TEM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CVS vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCVSTEM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)213.80--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.2513.41
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.3135.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.93--