Seek Returns logo

CVS vs. GILD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CVS and GILD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCVSGILD
Company NameCVS Health CorporationGilead Sciences, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesBiotechnology
Market Capitalization97.50 billion USD139.28 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973January 22, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CVS and GILD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CVS vs. GILD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCVSGILD
5-Day Price Return3.03%0.14%
13-Week Price Return10.48%-0.52%
26-Week Price Return13.73%-0.01%
52-Week Price Return22.25%32.57%
Month-to-Date Return1.96%0.14%
Year-to-Date Return71.24%20.33%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.56M8.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.55M7.10M
3-Month Volatility27.58%28.15%
Beta0.480.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CVS

5.95%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

CVS’s Return on Equity of 5.95% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GILD

32.97%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
97.92%
Q3
11.99%
Median
-19.30%
Q1
-51.29%
Min
-132.03%

In the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, GILD’s Return on Equity of 32.97% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CVS vs. GILD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CVS

1.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

CVS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.17% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GILD

21.87%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
73.34%
Q3
18.98%
Median
-12.96%
Q1
-105.72%
Min
-259.82%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.87% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CVS vs. GILD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CVS

2.44%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

CVS’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.44% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

GILD

27.89%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
78.85%
Q3
21.90%
Median
-13.30%
Q1
-109.94%
Min
-278.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 27.89% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CVS vs. GILD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCVSGILD
Return on Equity (TTM)5.95%32.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.78%11.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.17%21.87%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)2.44%27.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)13.82%78.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CVS

0.80

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

CVS’s Current Ratio of 0.80 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GILD

1.32

Biotechnology Industry

Max
16.97
Q3
8.39
Median
4.11
Q1
2.64
Min
0.74

GILD’s Current Ratio of 1.32 falls into the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CVS vs. GILD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CVS

0.86

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

CVS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.86 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GILD

1.27

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.79
Median
0.12
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

GILD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Biotechnology industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.27. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CVS vs. GILD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CVS

3.08

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

CVS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GILD

1.71

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.03
Median
-9.59
Q1
-65.05
Min
-163.11

GILD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 is in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CVS vs. GILD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCVSGILD
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.801.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.620.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.861.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.081.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

CVS vs. GILD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CVS vs. GILD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CVS

3.54%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.54%, CVS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GILD

4.23%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GILD’s Dividend Yield of 4.23% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

CVS vs. GILD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CVS

74.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CVS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 74.62% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GILD

117.08%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 117.08%, GILD’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

CVS vs. GILD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCVSGILD
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.54%4.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)74.62%117.08%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CVS

21.10

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

CVS’s P/E Ratio of 21.10 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GILD

22.21

Biotechnology Industry

Max
40.44
Q3
39.37
Median
22.12
Q1
15.76
Min
3.48

GILD’s P/E Ratio of 22.21 is within the middle range for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CVS vs. GILD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CVS

0.25

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, CVS’s P/S Ratio of 0.25 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

GILD

4.86

Biotechnology Industry

Max
92.67
Q3
41.36
Median
8.45
Q1
4.46
Min
0.97

GILD’s P/S Ratio of 4.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CVS vs. GILD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CVS

1.13

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

CVS’s P/B Ratio of 1.13 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

GILD

7.01

Biotechnology Industry

Max
22.72
Q3
10.68
Median
4.55
Q1
2.44
Min
0.59

GILD’s P/B Ratio of 7.01 is within the conventional range for the Biotechnology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CVS vs. GILD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCVSGILD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.1022.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.254.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.137.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.4315.35