Seek Returns logo

CVNA vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CVNA and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CVNA is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCVNAVIPS
Company NameCarvana Co.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization43.94 billion USD10.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 28, 2017March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CVNA and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CVNA vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCVNAVIPS
5-Day Price Return-4.31%6.34%
13-Week Price Return7.86%35.42%
26-Week Price Return79.70%29.46%
52-Week Price Return112.33%17.34%
Month-to-Date Return-0.40%3.36%
Year-to-Date Return84.76%50.71%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.55M2.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.04M2.84M
3-Month Volatility51.16%29.15%
Beta3.580.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CVNA

44.11%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
64.63%
Q3
37.13%
Median
19.07%
Q1
10.79%
Min
-16.66%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CVNA’s Return on Equity of 44.11% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VIPS

17.61%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 17.61% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CVNA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CVNA

3.46%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.04%
Q3
10.99%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-4.37%

CVNA’s Net Profit Margin of 3.46% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIPS

6.53%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.53% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CVNA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CVNA

9.16%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
16.40%
Median
9.28%
Q1
4.05%
Min
-10.63%

CVNA’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.16% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VIPS

7.65%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.65% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CVNA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCVNAVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)44.11%17.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.60%9.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.46%6.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.16%7.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.89%23.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CVNA

4.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.81
Median
1.38
Q1
1.15
Min
0.52

CVNA’s Current Ratio of 4.00 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

VIPS

1.26

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CVNA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CVNA

3.30

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
1.57
Median
0.60
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

CVNA’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Specialty Retail industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.30. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VIPS

0.17

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.17 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CVNA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CVNA

1.61

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
39.12
Median
14.13
Q1
3.63
Min
-36.00

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CVNA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.61 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CVNA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCVNAVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.001.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.581.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.300.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.61150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

CVNA vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CVNA vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CVNA

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CVNA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CVNA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CVNA

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
192.64%
Q3
79.43%
Median
26.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CVNA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CVNA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCVNAVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CVNA

144.49

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
47.04
Q3
27.74
Median
23.51
Q1
13.77
Min
7.47

At 144.49, CVNA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

VIPS

10.35

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 10.35 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CVNA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CVNA

5.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
2.79
Median
1.21
Q1
0.53
Min
0.09

CVNA’s P/S Ratio of 5.00 is in the upper echelon for the Specialty Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIPS

0.68

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.68 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CVNA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CVNA

41.71

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.92
Median
3.98
Q1
1.86
Min
0.55

At 41.71, CVNA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialty Retail industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VIPS

1.40

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CVNA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCVNAVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)144.4910.35
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.000.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)41.711.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)85.72--