Seek Returns logo

CVNA vs. TM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CVNA and TM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CVNA is a standard domestic listing, while TM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCVNATM
Company NameCarvana Co.Toyota Motor Corporation
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailAutomobiles
Market Capitalization40.92 billion USD253.55 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 28, 2017March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CVNA and TM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CVNA vs. TM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCVNATM
5-Day Price Return-2.20%6.57%
13-Week Price Return25.12%3.69%
26-Week Price Return32.94%-3.99%
52-Week Price Return162.11%14.38%
Month-to-Date Return-10.33%5.88%
Year-to-Date Return72.04%-9.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.74M32.52M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.88M31.57M
3-Month Volatility53.12%37.96%
Beta3.581.50

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CVNA

44.11%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CVNA’s Return on Equity of 44.11% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TM

12.02%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

TM’s Return on Equity of 12.02% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CVNA vs. TM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CVNA

3.46%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

CVNA’s Net Profit Margin of 3.46% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TM

8.82%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 8.82% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CVNA vs. TM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CVNA

9.16%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

CVNA’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.16% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TM

9.60%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.60% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CVNA vs. TM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCVNATM
Return on Equity (TTM)44.11%12.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.60%4.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.46%8.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.16%9.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.89%19.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CVNA

4.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

CVNA’s Current Ratio of 4.00 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TM

1.27

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

TM’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CVNA vs. TM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CVNA

3.30

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.30, CVNA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialty Retail industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TM

1.07

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

TM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CVNA vs. TM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CVNA

1.61

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CVNA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.61 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

TM

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

Interest Coverage Ratio data for TM is currently unavailable.

CVNA vs. TM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCVNATM
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.001.27
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.581.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.301.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.61--

Growth

Revenue Growth

CVNA vs. TM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CVNA vs. TM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CVNA

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CVNA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TM

3.16%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TM’s Dividend Yield of 3.16% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CVNA vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CVNA

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CVNA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TM

38.83%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

TM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.83% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CVNA vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCVNATM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%38.83%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CVNA

133.10

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

At 133.10, CVNA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

TM

8.72

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

TM’s P/E Ratio of 8.72 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CVNA vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CVNA

4.60

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

CVNA’s P/S Ratio of 4.60 is in the upper echelon for the Specialty Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TM

0.77

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

TM’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CVNA vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CVNA

41.71

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

At 41.71, CVNA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialty Retail industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TM

1.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

TM’s P/B Ratio of 1.09 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CVNA vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCVNATM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)133.108.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.600.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)41.711.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)78.9651.17