Seek Returns logo

CVNA vs. MGA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CVNA and MGA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCVNAMGA
Company NameCarvana Co.Magna International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustrySpecialty RetailAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization39.60 billion USD12.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 28, 2017October 5, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CVNA and MGA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CVNA vs. MGA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCVNAMGA
5-Day Price Return-1.16%-0.60%
13-Week Price Return10.94%20.18%
26-Week Price Return24.31%10.53%
52-Week Price Return117.41%9.35%
Month-to-Date Return-13.21%8.47%
Year-to-Date Return66.51%2.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.75M0.92M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.54M1.51M
3-Month Volatility52.37%27.61%
Beta3.601.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CVNA

44.11%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
61.19%
Q3
37.24%
Median
18.81%
Q1
8.92%
Min
-13.03%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CVNA’s Return on Equity of 44.11% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CVNA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CVNA

3.46%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.28%
Q3
10.68%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.43%
Min
-4.54%

CVNA’s Net Profit Margin of 3.46% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CVNA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CVNA

9.16%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
15.84%
Median
9.34%
Q1
3.83%
Min
-8.97%

CVNA’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.16% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CVNA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCVNAMGA
Return on Equity (TTM)44.11%10.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.60%3.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.46%2.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.16%4.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.89%13.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CVNA

4.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.83
Q3
1.89
Median
1.39
Q1
1.11
Min
0.64

CVNA’s Current Ratio of 4.00 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CVNA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CVNA

3.30

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.57
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.30, CVNA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialty Retail industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CVNA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CVNA

1.61

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
35.95
Median
14.13
Q1
3.61
Min
-36.00

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, CVNA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.61 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CVNA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCVNAMGA
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.001.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.580.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.300.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.618.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

CVNA vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CVNA vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CVNA

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.53%
Q3
2.69%
Median
1.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CVNA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MGA

4.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.35%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CVNA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CVNA

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
165.81%
Q3
80.94%
Median
31.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CVNA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CVNA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCVNAMGA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%44.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CVNA

127.96

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.56
Q3
29.15
Median
22.00
Q1
15.46
Min
7.95

At 127.96, CVNA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MGA

10.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 10.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CVNA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CVNA

4.43

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.08
Q3
2.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.48
Min
0.09

CVNA’s P/S Ratio of 4.43 is in the upper echelon for the Specialty Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MGA

0.30

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.30 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CVNA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CVNA

41.71

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.98
Median
3.69
Q1
1.79
Min
0.21

At 41.71, CVNA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialty Retail industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CVNA vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialty Retail and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCVNAMGA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)127.9610.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.430.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)41.710.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)75.916.83