CVE vs. WDS: Cenovus Energy vs. Woodside Energy Stock Comparison
How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Woodside Energy (WDS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Woodside Energy (WDS) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CVE is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while WDS falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
Cenovus Energy (CVE) trades as ordinary local shares, while Woodside Energy (WDS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | CVE | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cenovus Energy Inc. | Woodside Energy Group Ltd ADR |
| Country/Region | Canada | Australia |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 49.61 billion USD | 40.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 17, 2009 | November 18, 1996 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CVE | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 60.99% | 30.30% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.41% | 5.67% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.63% | 11.65% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CVE | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.47% | 33.53% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.38 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.51% | -48.77% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.90M | 570.04K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CVE | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | 0.78 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.20 | 1.11 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 7.68% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CVE.
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
WDS
Energy industry group
7.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- WDS
- 7.68%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 22.21% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
WDS
Energy industry group
22.21%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- WDS
- 22.21%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 23.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
WDS
Energy industry group
23.91%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- WDS
- 23.91%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CVE | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.44% | 7.68% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.05% | 2.83% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.42% | 22.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.58% | 23.91% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.92% | 34.92% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Woodside Energy (WDS) at -1.48% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at -24.02% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CVE.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CVE | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.62% | -1.48% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.75% | -8.26% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 28.74% | -24.02% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -12.42% | -30.68% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.39 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
WDS
Energy industry group
1.39
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- WDS
- 1.39
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 0.33 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- WDS
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CVE | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.64 | 1.39 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 1.15 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 5.41% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, WDS the richer one.
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
5.41%
- Max
- 8.57%
- WDS
- 5.41%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 69.78% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
69.78%
- Max
- 133.24%
- WDS
- 69.78%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CVE | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.04% | 5.41% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.84% | 69.78% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 13.15 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
WDS
Energy industry group
13.15
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- WDS
- 13.15
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 2.89 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
2.89
- Max
- 5.40
- WDS
- 2.89
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.11 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
WDS
Energy industry group
1.11
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- WDS
- 1.11
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CVE | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.56 | 13.15 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 2.89 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.98 | 1.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 20.71% | 1.41% |