CVE vs. SLB: Cenovus Energy vs. SLB Stock Comparison
How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and SLB (SLB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cenovus Energy (CVE) and SLB (SLB) both fall under the Energy industry group, but CVE is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels while SLB is classified in Energy Equipment & Services.
| Profile Item | CVE | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cenovus Energy Inc. | SLB N.V. |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Energy Equipment & Services |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Capitalization | 49.61 billion USD | 73.68 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 17, 2009 | December 31, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CVE | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 60.99% | 41.53% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.41% | 1.23% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.63% | 10.62% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CVE | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.47% | 37.07% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.80 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.51% | -46.63% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.90M | 12.57M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CVE | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | 1.00 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.20 | 1.59 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% sits in the top ROE quartile, while SLB (SLB) at 11.66% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CVE.
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
SLB
Energy industry group
11.66%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- SLB
- 11.66%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% and SLB (SLB) at 8.40% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
SLB
Energy industry group
8.40%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- SLB
- 8.40%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and SLB (SLB) at 14.03% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
SLB
Energy industry group
14.03%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- SLB
- 14.03%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CVE | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.44% | 11.66% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.05% | 5.72% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.42% | 8.40% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.58% | 14.03% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.92% | 16.59% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
SLB (SLB) at -1.60% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while SLB (SLB) at -24.44% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CVE.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CVE | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.62% | -1.60% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.75% | 8.33% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 28.74% | -24.44% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -12.42% | -0.56% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 and SLB (SLB) at 1.39 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
SLB
Energy industry group
1.39
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- SLB
- 1.39
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 and SLB (SLB) at 0.47 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
SLB
Energy industry group
0.47
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- SLB
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CVE | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.64 | 1.39 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.33 | 0.47 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 1.25 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% and SLB (SLB) at 2.36% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SLB
Energy industry group
2.36%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- SLB
- 2.36%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while SLB (SLB) at 56.80% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SLB
Energy industry group
56.80%
- Max
- 133.24%
- SLB
- 56.80%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CVE | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.04% | 2.36% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.84% | 56.80% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while SLB (SLB) at 24.23 sits in the richer quartile — SLB needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
SLB
Energy industry group
24.23
- Max
- 39.54
- SLB
- 24.23
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while SLB (SLB) at 2.00 prices around its industry’s middle — CVE costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
SLB
Energy industry group
2.00
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- SLB
- 2.00
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while SLB (SLB) at 2.83 carries an above-peer premium to book — SLB is pricier on assets.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
SLB
Energy industry group
2.83
- Max
- 4.21
- SLB
- 2.83
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CVE | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.56 | 24.23 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 2.00 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.98 | 2.83 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 20.71% | 4.18% |