CVE vs. MPC: Cenovus Energy vs. Marathon Petroleum Stock Comparison
How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CVE is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while MPC falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.
| Profile Item | CVE | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cenovus Energy Inc. | Marathon Petroleum Corp. |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Capitalization | 49.61 billion USD | 101.49 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 17, 2009 | June 24, 2011 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CVE | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 60.99% | 104.94% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.41% | 42.97% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.63% | 45.42% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CVE | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.47% | 37.53% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.56 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.51% | -44.75% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.90M | 2.56M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CVE | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | 2.68 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.20 | 4.10 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 60.46% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% also sits in the top quartile.
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
MPC
Energy industry group
60.46%
- MPC
- 60.46%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 8.34% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
MPC
Energy industry group
8.34%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- MPC
- 8.34%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 17.98% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
MPC
Energy industry group
17.98%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- MPC
- 17.98%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CVE | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.44% | 60.46% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.05% | 13.75% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.42% | 8.34% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.58% | 17.98% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.92% | 16.20% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at -4.44% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 31.15% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CVE | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.62% | -4.44% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.75% | -9.23% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 28.74% | 31.15% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -12.42% | -22.24% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.45 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
MPC
Energy industry group
1.45
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- MPC
- 1.45
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.15 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
MPC
Energy industry group
1.15
- Max
- 1.75
- MPC
- 1.15
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CVE | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.64 | 1.45 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.33 | 1.15 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 0.88 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.09% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MPC
Energy industry group
1.09%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- MPC
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 7.93% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MPC
Energy industry group
7.93%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- MPC
- 7.93%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CVE | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.04% | 1.09% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.84% | 7.93% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 7.39 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for MPC, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
MPC
Energy industry group
7.39
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- MPC
- 7.39
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 0.58 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
MPC
Energy industry group
0.58
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- MPC
- 0.58
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 4.42 prices above its benchmark range — MPC looks rich relative to book.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
MPC
Energy industry group
4.42
- MPC
- 4.42
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CVE | MPC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.56 | 7.39 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 0.58 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.98 | 4.42 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 20.71% | 16.00% |