CVE vs. IMO: Cenovus Energy vs. Imperial Oil Stock Comparison
How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Imperial Oil (IMO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Imperial Oil (IMO) are both classified in the Integrated Oil & Gas sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | CVE | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cenovus Energy Inc. | Imperial Oil Limited |
| Country/Region | Canada | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Integrated Oil & Gas |
| Market Capitalization | 49.61 billion USD | 58.92 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE American |
| Listing Date | November 17, 2009 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CVE | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 60.99% | 35.68% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.41% | 34.62% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.63% | 32.18% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CVE | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.47% | 30.00% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.58 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.51% | -29.72% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.90M | 573.33K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CVE | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | 1.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.20 | 1.51 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
IMO
Energy industry group
25.24%
- Max
- 53.85%
- IMO
- 25.24%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
IMO
Energy industry group
10.88%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- IMO
- 10.88%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
IMO
Energy industry group
21.36%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- IMO
- 21.36%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CVE | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.44% | 25.24% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.05% | 10.93% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.42% | 10.88% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.58% | 21.36% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.92% | 20.08% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.
EPS Growth
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CVE.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CVE | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.62% | -7.42% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.75% | -7.56% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 28.74% | -28.24% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -12.42% | -17.26% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
IMO
Energy industry group
1.30
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- IMO
- 1.30
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
IMO
Energy industry group
0.17
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- IMO
- 0.17
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CVE | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.64 | 1.30 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.33 | 0.17 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 0.13 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IMO
Energy industry group
2.65%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- IMO
- 2.65%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IMO
Energy industry group
26.49%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- IMO
- 26.49%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CVE | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.04% | 2.65% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.84% | 26.49% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
IMO
Energy industry group
13.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- IMO
- 13.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 prices around its industry’s middle — CVE costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
IMO
Energy industry group
1.06
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- IMO
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 carries an above-peer premium to book — IMO is pricier on assets.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
IMO
Energy industry group
3.38
- Max
- 4.21
- IMO
- 3.38
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CVE | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.56 | 13.78 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 1.06 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.98 | 3.38 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 20.71% | 9.90% |