CVE vs. EQT: Cenovus Energy vs. EQT Stock Comparison
How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and EQT (EQT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cenovus Energy (CVE) and EQT (EQT) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CVE is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while EQT falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
| Profile Item | CVE | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cenovus Energy Inc. | EQT Corporation |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 49.61 billion USD | 30.90 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 17, 2009 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 60.99% | -12.42% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.41% | 9.89% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.63% | 21.61% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.47% | 30.02% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.70 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.51% | -42.56% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.90M | 7.75M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | -0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.20 | -0.80 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% sits in the top ROE quartile, while EQT (EQT) at 10.49% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CVE.
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
EQT
Energy industry group
10.49%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- EQT
- 10.49%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
EQT (EQT) at 29.01% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
EQT
Energy industry group
29.01%
- Max
- 56.92%
- EQT
- 29.01%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and EQT (EQT) at 28.24% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
EQT
Energy industry group
28.24%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- EQT
- 28.24%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.44% | 10.49% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.05% | 6.25% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.42% | 29.01% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.58% | 28.24% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.92% | 80.40% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EQT (EQT) at 59.96% delivers above-range revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Both companies show strong earnings momentum, but EQT (EQT) at 635.56% is the standout with EPS growth above its industry range; Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% also sits in the top quartile.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.62% | 59.96% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.75% | -11.72% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 28.74% | 635.56% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -12.42% | -8.91% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while EQT (EQT) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for EQT.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
EQT
Energy industry group
0.71
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- EQT
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
EQT (EQT) at 0.19 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
EQT
Energy industry group
0.19
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- EQT
- 0.19
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.64 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.33 | 0.19 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 0.81 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% and EQT (EQT) at 1.30% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EQT
Energy industry group
1.30%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- EQT
- 1.30%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% and EQT (EQT) at 15.64% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EQT
Energy industry group
15.64%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- EQT
- 15.64%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.04% | 1.30% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.84% | 15.64% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 and EQT (EQT) at 11.71 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
EQT
Energy industry group
11.71
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- EQT
- 11.71
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while EQT (EQT) at 3.38 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
EQT
Energy industry group
3.38
- Max
- 5.40
- EQT
- 3.38
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 and EQT (EQT) at 1.21 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
EQT
Energy industry group
1.21
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- EQT
- 1.21
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.56 | 11.71 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 3.38 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.98 | 1.21 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 20.71% | 8.01% |